2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2017.09.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship program for patients with febrile neutropenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
3
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
20
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…4 The majority of the published literature focuses on guideline development for FN or sepsis management in cancer patients. Four studies focused on the impact of FN guideline implementation on antimicrobial use, [19][20][21][22] and 2 studies examined the impact on mortality (Table 2). 23,24…”
Section: Guidelines and Clinical Pathways For Empirical Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 The majority of the published literature focuses on guideline development for FN or sepsis management in cancer patients. Four studies focused on the impact of FN guideline implementation on antimicrobial use, [19][20][21][22] and 2 studies examined the impact on mortality (Table 2). 23,24…”
Section: Guidelines and Clinical Pathways For Empirical Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Madran et al 19 reported their experience with a clinical pathway for FN management implemented by a newly formed multidisciplinary ASP. A total of 152 episodes of FN from oncology patients were analyzed, with 81 pre-implementation and 71 post-implementation.…”
Section: Treatment Of Febrile Neutropeniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the differences in study design, population and antimicrobial utilization due to different local treatment protocols and colonization rates by MDR bacteria, preceding results, similar to ours, illustrated the potential benefits of antimicrobial stewardship approaches. The adherence to ASP recommendation has demonstrated to be an effective and safe strategy with a 64% relative risk reduction in 28-day mortality [19] and a significant decrease in the fatality rate (from 30% to 11%) [5] both in patients with febrile neutropenia and hematological or solid tumors. In patients with hematological diseases and HSCT recipients, stopping antimicrobial therapy early did not significantly increase the incidence of fever relapse and positive blood cultures or the mortality rate, with the advantage of the reduction in the use of antibiotics [20][21][22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In hematological patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy, collateral damages of antimicrobial consumption, especially broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy, include the selection of multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms [2], an increased propensity to fungal infections [3], and microbiota dysbiosis [4]. Although, due to these reasons the impact of ASPs in patients with hematological diseases might be especially relevant, information regarding the development of antimicrobial stewardship strategies in these patients is scarce [5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prescriptions including at least one antibiotic were decreased, while antiviral use was increased and adherence to clinical pathway was increased in the post-ASP period when compared with pre-ASP period ( Table 2). The clinical pathway specific for the patients with febrile neutropenia was shown to decrease inappropriate antimicrobial use (Madran et al, 2018). In a recent study conducted in a tertiary university hospital in France, several ASPs including local treatment guidelines were implemented in ED and unnecessary antimicrobial prescriptions were decreased after implementation of these ASPs (Dinh et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%