2020
DOI: 10.1063/5.0020511
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of amplitude–phase analysis of complex interferograms for measurement of spontaneous magnetic fields in laser generated plasma

Abstract: Generation of spontaneous magnetic fields (SMFs) is one of the most interesting phenomena accompanying an intense laser–matter interaction. One method of credible SMFs measurements is based on the magneto-optical Faraday effect, which requires simultaneous measurements of an angle of polarization plane rotation of a probe wave and plasma electron density. In classical polaro-interferometry, these values are provided independently by polarimetric and interferometric images. Complex interferometry is an innovati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them the most significant are: (i) a probe beam depolarization in plasma, (ii) an influence of plasma self-luminosity, and (iii) a shot-to-shot instability of energy distribution in a cross-section of the probing beam. Hence the intensity, registered on a detector, can be described (see [19] ) by an equation:…”
Section: Mathematical Basis Of Complex Interferometry In a Quasistati...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Among them the most significant are: (i) a probe beam depolarization in plasma, (ii) an influence of plasma self-luminosity, and (iii) a shot-to-shot instability of energy distribution in a cross-section of the probing beam. Hence the intensity, registered on a detector, can be described (see [19] ) by an equation:…”
Section: Mathematical Basis Of Complex Interferometry In a Quasistati...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12B) can not be abelized by Gegenbauer polynomial approximation method [6,23] -the required even polynomial degree can not be simulated taking into account width of the abelized function. The Fourier [19] and Mach-Shardin [6,23] methods work better, however it is known that the latter one is sensitive to data irregularities, it's error is lowest at the boundary and raises to the center of considered function, increasing with the function length increase. Thus all of the data presented in this paper is calculated using the Fourier method, whose accuracy increases with the number of measured experimental points.…”
Section: Magnetic Field Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations