2002
DOI: 10.1002/tea.10038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of a peer‐led team learning instructional approach in an undergraduate organic chemistry course

Abstract: This study focuses on the implementation of a peer‐led team learning (PLTL) instructional approach for all students in an undergraduate organic chemistry course and the evaluation of student outcomes over 8 years. Students who experienced the student‐centered instruction and worked in small groups facilitated by a peer leader (treatment) in 1996–1999 were compared with students who experienced the traditional recitation section (control) in 1992–1994. Quantitative and qualitative data show statistically signif… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
255
0
10

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(280 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
15
255
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Various types of active, cooperative, small-group learning classroom environments for undergraduate organic chemistry have been previously reported in the literature (Dinan and Frydrychowski, 1995;Bradley et al, 2002;Tien et al, 2002;Hein, 2012;Chase et al, 2013;Conway, 2014;Fautch, 2015), so this work drew from the successes and lessons learned by examining the prior work. The instructor of record for the sections in this study had been teaching general chemistry classes in a cooperative learning classroom format with small, interactive student teams for several years, so basic challenges related to logistics and handling student teams during class time had been thoroughly addressed.…”
Section: Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various types of active, cooperative, small-group learning classroom environments for undergraduate organic chemistry have been previously reported in the literature (Dinan and Frydrychowski, 1995;Bradley et al, 2002;Tien et al, 2002;Hein, 2012;Chase et al, 2013;Conway, 2014;Fautch, 2015), so this work drew from the successes and lessons learned by examining the prior work. The instructor of record for the sections in this study had been teaching general chemistry classes in a cooperative learning classroom format with small, interactive student teams for several years, so basic challenges related to logistics and handling student teams during class time had been thoroughly addressed.…”
Section: Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The team's mandate was to design a course that would help first-year students make the transition to university while also providing them with a support system. The team designed and currently delivers WOK and ML based on principles and practices of active learning and peer-led learning, the power of which has been proven in a variety of different cases (Havnes, 2008;Kreie, Headrick, & Steiner, 2007;Lewis & Lewis, 2005;Tien, Roth, & Kampmeier, 2002;Smith, 2008). The primary purpose of these two courses is to help students develop the skills and abilities needed for academic success and to help them regard learning as a lifelong endeavor.…”
Section: Course Design and Goalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It influenced PAL through intensive use of problem-solving sessions for courses in STEM majors and mandatory attendance at weekly sessions (Treisman, 1986). The Peer-led Team Learning Program (PLTL, City University of New York) is used at hundreds of institutions with introductory science courses (Tien, Roth, & Kampmeier, 2002). It influenced PAL with its practice of embedding study review sessions as part of a companion class.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%