2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2015.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of a pain management algorithm in intensive care units and evaluation of nurses' level of adherence with the algorithm

Abstract: ICU nurses can use a pain management algorithm consistently. Findings from this study suggest that a pain management algorithm is a useful tool to increase ICU nurses' adherence with pain assessment.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
24
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…To design the educational content, we carried out an extensive, systematic review of pain management algorithms and programs in intensive care units. One study was selected that, compared to other studies, had appropriate indicators: having brief steps, easy clinical application, proper valid pain diagnosis scales, and assessment pain scale in patients with or without intubation ( 32 ). Then, due to the lack of transparency in the implementation process of therapeutic interventions in the existing algorithm, WHO and Shahriari et al’s ( 33 ) pain control models were used to make the algorithm more understandable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To design the educational content, we carried out an extensive, systematic review of pain management algorithms and programs in intensive care units. One study was selected that, compared to other studies, had appropriate indicators: having brief steps, easy clinical application, proper valid pain diagnosis scales, and assessment pain scale in patients with or without intubation ( 32 ). Then, due to the lack of transparency in the implementation process of therapeutic interventions in the existing algorithm, WHO and Shahriari et al’s ( 33 ) pain control models were used to make the algorithm more understandable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the BPS was found to be valid, reliable and easy to use, an intense awareness campaign and training for healthcare professionals is imperative for its use to be consistent, efficient and effective. ( 38 , 39 ) In addition, the development and implementation of protocols and clinical guidelines for care centered on the comfort of critical patients are crucial for humanization and improving the quality of care. ( 40 )…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,14,15,17,18,22,23,25,41,42 This partially could be the result of considerably lower ICC values during rest (fair-to-moderate) compared with the procedures (moderate-to-almost perfect), which was contrary to several previous studies. 8,10,[21][22][23]26,43 ICC values are assumed to be susceptible to between-subject variability, and a lack of subject variability can cause incorrect low ICC values. 34,44 A minority of the validation studies have assessed only patients after cardiac surgery, which likely were more homogenous populations in terms of diagnosis, age, severity of illness, pain and level of sedation, and analgesia than that of a general ICU population or a mixed medical/ surgical population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%