Abstract:The COVID-19 pandemic has propelled an unprecedented global implementation of telemedicine and telerehabilitation as well as its integration into the healthcare system. Here, we describe the clinical implementation of the A3E framework for the deployment of telerehabilitation in the inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation continuum by addressing accessibility, adaptability, accountability, and engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. By using an organized, coordinated, and stratified approach, we increased our… Show more
“…During the coronavirus pandemic, the need for maintenance of organ functions through rehabilitation and its continuation has put telerehabilitation programs in a status unusually seen before [13], not only during the acute phase but also in the postviral phase [14][15][16][17][18]. Such telerehabilitation demands and the consequent implementation of physiotherapy staff and training continue to this day [19,20]. Studies prior to the COVID-19 pandemic analyzed not only the therapeutic benefits of cardiac, neurological, or musculoskeletal telerehabilitation but also the cost savings for both healthcare providers and patients compared to traditional inpatient or face-to-face rehabilitation [21].…”
The worldwide incidence of COVID-19 has generated a pandemic of sequelae. These sequelae require multidisciplinary rehabilitative work to address the multisystemic symptoms that patients will present with now and in the future. The aim of the present systematic review is to analyze the current situation of telerehabilitation in patients with COVID-19 sequelae and its effectiveness. Searches were conducted on the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, PEDro, and Web of Science (WOS). There was no complete homogeneity among the five selected articles, so we differentiated two clinical subgroups for the clustering of outcome measures: (group one) patients with post-discharge symptoms and (group two) patients with permanent symptoms or “long COVID-19” defined as persistent symptoms > 2 months. For group one, post-discharge sequelae, improvements were obtained in cardiovascular parameters, and physical test studies in group two presented very favorable results in all the cardiorespiratory measures and physical tests evaluated. Telerehabilitation through therapeutic exercise based on mixed protocols of aerobic, respiratory, and low-load strength exercises appear to be an effective and safe strategy for the recovery of short- and long-term post-COVID-19 sequelae.
“…During the coronavirus pandemic, the need for maintenance of organ functions through rehabilitation and its continuation has put telerehabilitation programs in a status unusually seen before [13], not only during the acute phase but also in the postviral phase [14][15][16][17][18]. Such telerehabilitation demands and the consequent implementation of physiotherapy staff and training continue to this day [19,20]. Studies prior to the COVID-19 pandemic analyzed not only the therapeutic benefits of cardiac, neurological, or musculoskeletal telerehabilitation but also the cost savings for both healthcare providers and patients compared to traditional inpatient or face-to-face rehabilitation [21].…”
The worldwide incidence of COVID-19 has generated a pandemic of sequelae. These sequelae require multidisciplinary rehabilitative work to address the multisystemic symptoms that patients will present with now and in the future. The aim of the present systematic review is to analyze the current situation of telerehabilitation in patients with COVID-19 sequelae and its effectiveness. Searches were conducted on the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, PEDro, and Web of Science (WOS). There was no complete homogeneity among the five selected articles, so we differentiated two clinical subgroups for the clustering of outcome measures: (group one) patients with post-discharge symptoms and (group two) patients with permanent symptoms or “long COVID-19” defined as persistent symptoms > 2 months. For group one, post-discharge sequelae, improvements were obtained in cardiovascular parameters, and physical test studies in group two presented very favorable results in all the cardiorespiratory measures and physical tests evaluated. Telerehabilitation through therapeutic exercise based on mixed protocols of aerobic, respiratory, and low-load strength exercises appear to be an effective and safe strategy for the recovery of short- and long-term post-COVID-19 sequelae.
“…Together with knowledge that patients may tolerate shorter therapy sessions in the very early post-stroke period, the enhanced therapy model of care was developed by the stroke neurology team 13 . Based on these successes, this stroke ARISE model was later replicated in other clinical areas 14,15 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Based on these successes, this stroke ARISE model was later replicated in other clinical areas. 14,15 The stroke ARISE model provides daily PT, OT, and/or SLP depending on an individual's clinical presentation. Templated daily schedules are designed in collaboration with stroke unit nursing staff and leadership.…”
Introduction:The aim of this study was to determine the safety and feasibility of an enhanced therapy model for hospitalized stroke patients. Methods: This was a quasi-experimental cohort study of acute stroke patients from a single hospital. In the intervention group, all hospitalized patients on the acute stroke service were seen by at least two therapy disciplines daily in addition to routine stroke care. The comparison group consisted of all patients admitted to the same stroke service 1 year before who received the standard of care. The primary endpoint was the number of completed therapy sessions. Exploratory endpoints compared the length of hospital stay, hospital readmission rates, and degree of disability measured by the 90-day modified Rankin Scale score. Results: A total of 1110 records were analyzed with 553 subjects in the intervention group and 557 in the control group. The intervention group received a significantly higher number of therapy sessions. There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay. However, 30-day readmission rates were lower, and the percentage of patients who achieved a good functional outcome on the modified Rankin Scale was higher during the intervention period. Conclusion: Increasing exposure to intensive multidisciplinary therapy comparable with that of acute inpatient rehabilitation in the hospital setting is feasible and may reduce both readmission rates and disability.
“…15 In the innovation category, the MindMotion Go (MMGO) was deployed in the hospital, clinic, and home settings during the COVID-19 pandemic to extend rehabilitation with telerehabilitation even before the remote therapy monitoring reimbursement codes became available. 16 In the research category, an industrysponsored clinical trial was conducted with MedRhythms' wearable sensor paired with digital rhythmic auditory stimulation while listening to music for gait training poststroke, as part of a pivotal multicenter study for Food and Drug Administration approval. 17…”
Section: Center For Emerging Rehabilitation Technology Evaluations To...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mirrored Motion Works Bimanual Arm Trainer gamified rehabilitation device was deployed clinically across the continuum of care for rehabilitation of arm movement in individuals with poststroke hemiplegia as it provides training in out-of-synergy movements for profoundly weak patients who would otherwise be unable to participate in repetitive arm training 14 and primes the nervous system for upper limb therapy 15 . In the innovation category, the MindMotion Go (MMGO) was deployed in the hospital, clinic, and home settings during the COVID-19 pandemic to extend rehabilitation with telerehabilitation even before the remote therapy monitoring reimbursement codes became available 16 . In the research category, an industry-sponsored clinical trial was conducted with MedRhythms’ wearable sensor paired with digital rhythmic auditory stimulation while listening to music for gait training poststroke, as part of a pivotal multicenter study for Food and Drug Administration approval 17 …”
Section: Center For Emerging Rehabilitation Technology Evaluations To...mentioning
Technology-enhanced rehabilitation can improve access to training activities in multiple care delivery settings and may improve patient outcomes. However, the rate at which rehabilitation technology is being developed makes it difficult for healthcare systems to keep pace with the volume of products emerging in this space. Formal processes are needed to help healthcare systems review products as they emerge and to determine whether they should be incorporated into clinical practice. Here, we describe an approach to reviewing emerging rehabilitation technologies as performed by the Center for Emerging Rehabilitation Technology at our institution. Developed using an iterative approach, the rehabilitation technology review process used by the Center for Emerging Rehabilitation Technology team classifies technologies into the following three categories: (1) for clinical deployment, (2) for innovation in product development/product-market fit testing, and (3) for research, for example, a sponsored clinical trial. We describe the processes used to evaluate, categorize, investigate, and integrate rehabilitation technology, share our experience with the review process, and make recommendations for other institutions who may wish to implement rehabilitation technology into clinical practice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.