2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation evaluation of a professional development program for comprehensive school physical activity leaders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PE teachers felt confident to be a PAL and involved with a CSPAP, but organizational socialization factors (i.e., positive or negative support from administrators and school faculty) were perceived as consequential to their involvement. To overcome organizational socialization barriers, our findings and previous literature highlight the importance of PE teachers developing partnerships with school leaders [32,45,74,75] and fostering teacher and administrator support for effective CSPAP implementation and sustainability [49,50,[76][77][78][79]. Furthermore, RBSE literature suggests supervisors (e.g., school administrators) who provide job enrichment (i.e., increase employee responsibility with decision making) enhance employee RBSE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…PE teachers felt confident to be a PAL and involved with a CSPAP, but organizational socialization factors (i.e., positive or negative support from administrators and school faculty) were perceived as consequential to their involvement. To overcome organizational socialization barriers, our findings and previous literature highlight the importance of PE teachers developing partnerships with school leaders [32,45,74,75] and fostering teacher and administrator support for effective CSPAP implementation and sustainability [49,50,[76][77][78][79]. Furthermore, RBSE literature suggests supervisors (e.g., school administrators) who provide job enrichment (i.e., increase employee responsibility with decision making) enhance employee RBSE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Although there is a notable use of qualitative methods in our analyzed corpus, there are still a few papers that use mixed methods, such as the studies by Peeters and Vaidya (2016) or Saunders (2014) , where they show how mixed data collection models can provide a more complete and detailed view of professional capital. By combining quantitative and qualitative methods, objective and subjective data can be collected to provide a deeper understanding of teaching practice and the impact of professional training and development ( Carson et al, 2020 ; Gidari and Kakana, 2022 ). In addition, these mixed models can help address the limitations of individual data collection methods and improve the validity and reliability of results ( Fetters, 2016 ).…”
Section: Findings and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding is in line with a process evaluation of a CSPAP professional development program that also found that PA during the school day was the most commonly implemented component in a CSPAP. 56 These results suggest that PA 12 American Journal of Health Promotion XX(X) 1146 American Journal of Health Promotion 35 (8) during the school day may be the most feasible intervention other than PE to integrate. This review also found that the number of studies decreased as the number of CSPAP components implemented increased.…”
Section: Various Combinations Of Cspap Componentsmentioning
confidence: 97%