2020 25th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/etfa46521.2020.9211914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation Aspects of Multi-Level Frame Preemption in TSN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the authors also compare TAS and frame preemption from a qualitative standpoint and promote the multi-level frame preemption feature as a viable alternative to TAS. Furthermore, Knezic et al [27] provided an enhanced implementation approach for the multi-level preemption feature and the formal worstcase traversal time analysis of this approach was provided by Ojewale et al [26]. On another front, a work by Nasrallah et al [10] conducts a performance comparison of TAS and Asynchronous Traffic Shaping (ATS).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the authors also compare TAS and frame preemption from a qualitative standpoint and promote the multi-level frame preemption feature as a viable alternative to TAS. Furthermore, Knezic et al [27] provided an enhanced implementation approach for the multi-level preemption feature and the formal worstcase traversal time analysis of this approach was provided by Ojewale et al [26]. On another front, a work by Nasrallah et al [10] conducts a performance comparison of TAS and Asynchronous Traffic Shaping (ATS).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Service-oriented dynamic connection management for software-defined internet of vehicles [26] A distributed in-vehicle service architecture using dynamically created web Services [27] SODA: Service-Oriented Architecture for Runtime Adaptive Driver Assistance Systems [28] RACE: A centralized platform computer based architecture for automotive applications [29] Achieving determinism in adaptive AUTOSAR [30] Software-Defined Networking in Automotive [31] Figure Analysis and modeling of asynchronous traffic shaping in time sensitive networks [40] Formal worst-case timing analysis of ethernet tsn's time-aware and peristaltic shapers [41] On the Performance of Stream-based, Class-based Time-aware Shaping and Frame Preemption in TSN [42] Gate-Shrunk Time Aware Shaper: Low-Latency Converged Network for 5G Fronthaul and M2M Services [43] An Approach to Improve Bandwidth Utilization in TSN Networks [44] Time-Triggered Switch-Memory-Switch Architecture for Time-Sensitive Networking Switches [45] SP-PIFO: Approximating Push-In First-Out Behaviors using Strict-Priority Queues [46] Chamaleon: Predictable Latency and high Utilization with Queue-Aware and Adaptive Source Routing [47] Performance assessment of the IEEE802.1Qch in an automotive scenario [48] Assessments of Real-Time Communications over TSN Automotive Networks [49] No-wait packet scheduling for IEEE time-sensitive networks (TSN) [50] Development of an Ethernet-based heuristic time-sensitive networking scheduling algorithm for real-time in-vehicle data transmission [51] Deadline-aware online scheduling of TSN flows for automotive applications [52] Implementation Aspects of Multi-Level Frame Preemption in TSN [53] A novel frame preemption model in TSN networks [54] Quantitative performance comparison of various traffic shapers in time-sensitive networking [55] Comparison of IEEE802.1Q and IEEE802.1AVB in multi switch environment in embedded system [56] Insights on the Performance and Configuration of AVB and TSN in Automotive Ethernet Networks [20] An Architecture for In-Vehicle Networks [16] Figure Survey and taxonomy of information-centric vehicular networking security attacks [83] ...…”
Section: Software Defined Vehiclementioning
confidence: 99%