2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.10.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation and test of an RSSI-based indoor target localization system: Human movement effects on the accuracy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The result showed that people's presence in the Line of Sight (LOS) between the AP and the Mobile Device (MD) decreased the RSSI by 2 dBm to 5 dBm. This decline in RSSI could result in a position error of more than 2 m. Hence, an adaptive IPS that can adapt to environmental changes, including user orientation [89] and people's presence [90], [91], is needed to improve the accuracy of IPS.…”
Section: Future Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result showed that people's presence in the Line of Sight (LOS) between the AP and the Mobile Device (MD) decreased the RSSI by 2 dBm to 5 dBm. This decline in RSSI could result in a position error of more than 2 m. Hence, an adaptive IPS that can adapt to environmental changes, including user orientation [89] and people's presence [90], [91], is needed to improve the accuracy of IPS.…”
Section: Future Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The human activity around MS affects WLAN signal strength [26]. One past study observed a relationship between the fluctuations in RSSI and people activity within a WLAN coverage area.…”
Section: People Presence Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Booranawong et al [26] proposed well-known filtering methods (i.e., the moving average and the exponentially weighted moving average filters) and the span thresholding filter to reduce RSSI variations and obtained an estimated position error because of human movement. Unfortunately, the size of the room used for the test was quite small and the error was still above 1 m.…”
Section: People Presence Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the RANSAC algorithm is not applicable to an indoor tracking system since the actual distance between such devices is unknown. The work presented in [13] by Booranawong et al presents an analysis between three filter algorithms: Window Moving Average Filter (WMAF), Exponentially Weighted Moving Average Filter (EWMAF) and Span Thresholding Filter (STF). These algorithms are suitable for tracking since the current position estimate is obtained using previous RSSI values, i.e., the position estimates are determined using actual RSSI samples and not by applying a signal propagation model.…”
Section: Factors Affecting Wi-fi Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the noisy nature of the Wi-Fi signal, which is reflected in continuous variations of RSSI value, RSSI-based indoor tracking systems can considerably vary. To overcome this problem, a smoothing algorithm can be used in order to reduce the RSSI value noise [13].…”
Section: Rssi Smoothingmentioning
confidence: 99%