2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-40247-5_36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation and Evaluation of Interactive Memory-Aid Agent Service for People with Dementia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Expanding on this, another study conducted under controlled conditions developed a new reminder system for people with dementia which primarily used a Virtual Agent user interface – i.e. a “chat bot” or simulated person who conversed with the person with dementia – as well as a touch screen graphical user interface (Tokunaga et al, 2016). The device was trialled with 17 hospital patients with dementia and their carers, and the study found that participants could use it and interact with the Virtual Agent, at least to some degree (Tokunaga et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Expanding on this, another study conducted under controlled conditions developed a new reminder system for people with dementia which primarily used a Virtual Agent user interface – i.e. a “chat bot” or simulated person who conversed with the person with dementia – as well as a touch screen graphical user interface (Tokunaga et al, 2016). The device was trialled with 17 hospital patients with dementia and their carers, and the study found that participants could use it and interact with the Virtual Agent, at least to some degree (Tokunaga et al, 2016).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a “chat bot” or simulated person who conversed with the person with dementia – as well as a touch screen graphical user interface (Tokunaga et al, 2016). The device was trialled with 17 hospital patients with dementia and their carers, and the study found that participants could use it and interact with the Virtual Agent, at least to some degree (Tokunaga et al, 2016). However, this study did not assess the usefulness of the device for prospective memory, evaluate outcomes for users, or trial its usefulness in home environments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 4 studies, the user could only give yes or no or a few other short commands [ 24 , 33 , 34 , 40 ]. The user verbal command options in the studies by Tokunaga et al [ 19 , 32 ] were unclear. Only the studies by Ali et al [ 30 ] and Razavi et al [ 31 ] report a short (3-5 turns) open dialogue on a range of topics such as weather, pets, retirement, life goals, growing older, and spirituality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wargnier et al [ 24 ] and Tsiourti et al [ 33 ] did not use existing usability questionnaires from the literature, such as the System Usability Scale, but created new usability questionnaires. The studies by Tokunaga et al [ 19 , 32 ] were more oriented toward the functional performance of the agent, whereas Oliveira et al [ 35 ] did not report clear usability measurement methods and results. A comparison between the usabilities is difficult to make because of the difference in the methods and scales used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation