2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2006.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation and evaluation of an HIV/STD intervention in Peru

Abstract: This paper presents the lessons learned through a process evaluation (PE) after one year of implementation of a two-year community intervention in Lima, Peru. The intervention consisted of training and motivating community popular opinion leaders (CPOLs) for three marginal population segments to disseminate prevention messages among their peers. PE data included: observations, qualitative interviews with CPOLS, conversations and messages delivered by CPOLs, training facilitators' perceptions about implementati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(9,10) Peer-led HIV interventions, which train peer health educators to deliver community-based HIV prevention information, have increased condom use and decreased unprotected anal intercourse, with sustained behavior change up to 3 years later. (11,12) Researchers have proposed using online technologies as tools to rapidly and cost-effectively deliver peer-led HIV prevention among at-risk populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(9,10) Peer-led HIV interventions, which train peer health educators to deliver community-based HIV prevention information, have increased condom use and decreased unprotected anal intercourse, with sustained behavior change up to 3 years later. (11,12) Researchers have proposed using online technologies as tools to rapidly and cost-effectively deliver peer-led HIV prevention among at-risk populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, this 12-week intervention (with post-intervention and 1-year follow-up assessments) tested whether participants who were invited to Facebook groups to receive peer-mentored HIV prevention and behavior change information (compared to those invited to groups without this information) would be more likely to test for HIV. The HOPE Peru intervention is not a diffusion of innovations study by formal terms (9,10), but is a blended intervention that incorporates components of that theory and social normative theory and interventions (20,2224). Additional information about the intervention is available (20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leaders are persons who are similar to the target population in terms of age, education, sexual orientation and other characteristics (8). They are trained on a health topic and then go into the community to communicate information in a culturally and socially appropriate manner (9), with the intent to educate and change social norms and behaviors (4,8,10). These interventions have been associated with increased knowledge of HIV, condom use and decreased unprotected anal intercourse in both developing and developed countries (1–5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Close variants of such interventions so far include HIV-prevention efforts that have successfully mobilised popular opinion leaders to advocate for HIV prevention within communities considered at-risk (Kelly, 2004; Maiorana, Kegeles, Fernandez, Salazar, Caceres, Sandoval et al , 2007), and the mobilisation of injecting drug users (IDUs) to advocate for HIV prevention among other IDUs (Latkin, Mandell, Vlahov, Oziemkowska & Celentano, 1996; Latkin, 1998). There have also been peer-led HIV-prevention programmes among sex workers (Basu, Jana, Rotheram-Borus, Swendeman, Lee, Newman & Wiess, 2004) as well as HIV-positive peers trained to advocate for HIV prevention and risk reduction with other PLHIV (Raja, McKirnan & Glick, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%