2017
DOI: 10.1109/mits.2017.2743201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation and Evaluation of a Cooperative Vehicle-to-Pedestrian Safety Application

Abstract: While the development of Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) safety applications based on Dedicated Short-Range Communications (DSRC) has been extensively undergoing standardization for more than a decade, such applications are extremely missing for Vulnerable Road Users (VRUs). Nonexistence of collaborative systems between VRUs and vehicles was the main reason for this lack of attention. Recent developments in Wi-Fi Direct and DSRC-enabled smartphones are changing this perspective. Leveraging the existing V2V platforms,… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, in addition to the safety measures to protect vehicle occupants, determined efforts have to be done to implement specific measures to prevent fatalities and injuries of VRUs, such as cyclists and pedestrians, is needed to protect users outside of the vehicle [59]. Current pedestrian detection is based on advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) with onboard sensors, such as cameras, radar and LIDAR, to detect the presence of VRUs [60,61]. All of these sensors require line of sight (LOS) to properly work and they cannot detect VRUs in case of obstacles partially or totally occluding the visibility, such as trees, trucks or buildings.…”
Section: Pedestrian Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, in addition to the safety measures to protect vehicle occupants, determined efforts have to be done to implement specific measures to prevent fatalities and injuries of VRUs, such as cyclists and pedestrians, is needed to protect users outside of the vehicle [59]. Current pedestrian detection is based on advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) with onboard sensors, such as cameras, radar and LIDAR, to detect the presence of VRUs [60,61]. All of these sensors require line of sight (LOS) to properly work and they cannot detect VRUs in case of obstacles partially or totally occluding the visibility, such as trees, trucks or buildings.…”
Section: Pedestrian Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Human-vehicle interaction mediated by v2x communication (e.g., vehicle to wearable device) can provide a greater level of communication between human and vehicle, complementary to, or as an alternative to, visual physical gestures or signaling. A Vehicleto-Pedestrian framework is provided in [63] using a DSRCenabled smartphone.…”
Section: B Vehicle-to-pedestrian Cooperationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To show that Ω is invariant over the infinite horizon of the second mode of (15), constraint satisfaction should be checked over a long enough finite horizon (N c ). Here, N c is the smallest number which satisfies the following equations…”
Section: Cacc-stochastic Model Predictive Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state variables of system (13), x[k], asymptotically converge to zero, i.e. the system is asymptotically stable, under the control law(15) if predicted cost J[k] is an infinite cost, (A, Q 12 ) is observable, and the tailũ[k] is feasible for all k > 0 wherẽu[k + 1] = u * [k + 1|k], . .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%