Implementasi dan Analisis Simulasi QOS dan Perfomance Device dengan Menggunakan ONOS dan Iperf3

Computer network conditions that are dynamic and also complex make network operators often make mistakes in the configuration of a network device. However, these mistakes can be resolved by the emergence of a centralized programming approach which is now known as Software Defined Network (SDN). In addition, with the development of information technology, several services in computer networks also grabbed a lot of attention from the world, such as video streaming services. A video streaming service that is so massive is capable of having an impact on data traffic on computer networks. In SDN networks, controllers are a core component of this architecture. Currently, many different types of SDN controllers can be used, however, choosing a controller in an SDN network must be an important concern. This is related to the performance of the SDN controller which is a requirement for SDN network development. This research will analyze the performance of the video streaming service using the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) streaming protocol in testing two SDN controllers, namely Pox and Opendaylight. Based on the tests that have been carried out, it produces Quality of Service (QoS) values in the form of throughput, delay, and jitter. The Pox controller excels in the value of QoS delay and throughput. As for the jitter value, both Pox and Opendaylight controllers have good indexes.

show abstract

“…Tahapan penelitian pada gambar 1 ini terdiri dari 4 (empat) tahap, yaitu: (1). studi literatur, (2).…”

Section: Metode Penelitian Gambar 1 Metode Penelitianunclassified

“…I. PENDAHULUAN Jaringan Komputer yang dibangun dalam skala besar tentu mempunyai tingkat kompleksitas yang rumit sehingga seorang administrator jaringan harus bisa mengkonfigurasi jaringan secara manual [1]. Tidak menutup kemungkinan kondisi jaringan yang dinamis juga kompleks membuat operator jaringan kerap melakukan kesalahan.…”

unclassified

Performansi Software Defined Network Controller Pada Streaming Video Menggunakan Real-time Transport Protocol

Kodar

Gunawan²,

Rahmatulloh³

2021

JuTISI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Kartadie and Panggayuh in their research, present a test on Floodlight and ONOS controllers, where the test results show that the Floodlight controller is more stable than ONOS in terms of overcoming switch and host loads [11] . Pratama and Wikantyasa on their research, implementing and analyzing the simulation of Quality of Service (QoS) and performance device OpenFlow switch using ONOS as controller, to monitor the device performance and iperf3 as a Quality of Service (QoS) testing [12] Halomoan, et al, explained in their research about the operational Open Flow controller using the Open Network Operating System (ONOS) [13]. In her research, Annisa offers a solution for the development of SDN-based network management at Sekayu Polytechnic using the concept of network programming, hardware efficiency, and centralized control, with the results of research in the form of Quality of Service (QoS) of 18 ms on SDN networks and 37,7 ms on a conventional network [14].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Design and Implementation of SDN IP Based on Open Network Operating System and Border Gateway Protocol

Pratama

2021

Bulletin of Comp. Sci. Electr. Eng.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The development of computer network technology in the form of Software Defined Networking (SDN), provides many facilities for users to be able to develop network control applications, which can separate the data plane function from the control plane. The existence of this separation on routers and switches makes it easy for developers to centrally develop software and devices according to what is needed by users. However, there were obstacles to implementing SDN on IP networks in a short time. For this reason, it is necessary to implement SDN in stages by adding SDN to the existing IP network in the form of SDN IP, so that SDN can be connected and exchange routing information autonomously. This study focuses on the design and implementation of SDN IP using the Open Network Operating System (ONOS) on the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). The results show that the design and implementation of SDN IP based on ONOS and BGP can be done well, where SDN can connect and exchange routing information with the Autonomous System (AS) native BGP-based network. Key word(s): Autonomous System (AS) Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) Open Network Operating System (ONOS) Software-Defined Networking (SDN) SDN IP

show abstract

“…Penelitiannya menggunakan tiga skenario topolog full mesh yang berjumlah switch 6, 8 dan 10 dan masing-masisng switch mempunyai 2 host yang terhubung. Berdasarkan simulasi yang dilakukannya nilai QoS yang didapat untuk kedua kontroler masih dalam standar ITU-T G.1010 yaitu delay kecil dari 15s untuk data, kecil dari 150ms untuk Voip dan kecil dari 10s untuk video.Penelitian yang dikaji oleh I Putu Eka Pratama dan I Made Adhiarta Wikantyasa[10], melakukan Analisis performance device Opeflow switch pada jaringan SDN yang dibuat dengan menggunakan ONOS Controller. Topologi custom yang dibuat menggunakan Bahasa pemograman phyton pada mininet API dengan 18 host dan 10 switch, kemudian dilakukan pengujian QoS menggunakan Iperf3 dan untuk keduanya melakukan analisis performansi dari device Openflow switch pada jaringan SDN.…”

unclassified

Analysis Performance in Software Defined Network (Sdn) Using Aruba Van Controller

Rifqi¹,

Ikhwan²,

Ginting³

2020

JPIT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SDN technology is a new architecture in the network that separates the control plan from the data plan. Aruba VAN Controller provides centralized control in a network architecture that runs on the OpenFlow protocol. This study conducted an SDN network simulation using the Aruba VAN Controller by applying the Narmox Spear application to simplify network configuration. IP addressing with DHCP server, for testing scenarios using UDP protocol packet delivery with packets sent at 1000 Bytes, the number of packets sent is 100 packets/s, then given background traffic variations of 50 Mbps, 100 Mbps, 150 Mbps and 200 Mbps to networks that have two different link bandwidth values as a comparison for analyzing the results of testing the QoS parameters, which are 100 Mbps and 200 Mbps. The test results are obtained when background traffic exceeds the link bandwidth capacity, the resulting throughput will be smaller on the destination side by 485.64 Kb/s, delay increases by 240.21 ms, then for jitter by 2.48 ms, resulting in overload resulting in packet loss of 37.41%. However, when background traffic increases and does not exceed the specified link bandwidth capacity, the overall QoS parameter value is generated in the good category, namely throughput of 774.42 Kb/s, delay of 0.41 ms, jitter of 0.37 ms and packet loss of 0.00%. Keyword - SDN, Aruba VAN Controller, OpenFlow, DHCP, UDP, QoS

show abstract

Implementasi dan Analisis Simulasi QOS dan Perfomance Device dengan Menggunakan ONOS dan Iperf3

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Performansi Software Defined Network Controller Pada Streaming Video Menggunakan Real-time Transport Protocol

Performansi Software Defined Network Controller Pada Streaming Video Menggunakan Real-time Transport Protocol

Design and Implementation of SDN IP Based on Open Network Operating System and Border Gateway Protocol

Analysis Performance in Software Defined Network (Sdn) Using Aruba Van Controller

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About