2013
DOI: 10.1097/moo.0b013e32836385d1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implants in facial skeletal augmentation

Abstract: Facial augmentation using alloplastic implants remains a tried, tested, and true means of correcting skeletal insufficiencies and abnormalities. Thus, what was once old will be new again, and a renaissance in the use of facial implants will undoubtedly occur.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4), and nerve hypesthesia/anesthesia. 4 Several studies have focused on complications of solid chin implants in particular, and were in agreement that one of the most common complications was dysesthesia secondary to manipulation of the mental nerves. This is seen in 20 to 30% of the patients, more often with anatomical implants and larger implants, and most patients have resolution of symptoms over several months.…”
Section: Mandibularmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…4), and nerve hypesthesia/anesthesia. 4 Several studies have focused on complications of solid chin implants in particular, and were in agreement that one of the most common complications was dysesthesia secondary to manipulation of the mental nerves. This is seen in 20 to 30% of the patients, more often with anatomical implants and larger implants, and most patients have resolution of symptoms over several months.…”
Section: Mandibularmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Complications seen with midface implantation include inadequate correction or overcorrection, malposition, implant migration, infection, extrusion, nerve hypesthesia/anesthesia, and facial nerve injury. 4 For malar implants, the average infection rate is 2.4% and displacement rate is 2.3%. 8 In terms of orbital and periorbital implants, Rubin and Yaremchuk noted high rates of extrusion with smooth implants such as silicone (3.1%) and overall rates of infection and extrusion averaging 2.1 and 1.6%, respectively.…”
Section: Complications Seen In Particular Implant Locations Midfacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations