1998
DOI: 10.1116/1.590106
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implanted gallium-ion concentrations of focused-ion-beam prepared cross sections

Abstract: A gallium (Ga) focused-ion-beam (FIB) has been popularly used to prepare cross-sectional samples for transmission electron microscopes (TEMs) and scanning electron or ion microscopes. However, characteristics of the FIB-prepared cross sections such as ion concentration and radiation damage have been little studied either in theory or in experiment. In the present study, cross sections prepared by 30 keV Ga FIB are modeled using a combination of analytical and Monte Carlo methods to calculate the implanted Ga c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
3
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Typical I±V characteristics for implanted Ga contacts and thermally deposited Al and Ti contacts. Inset shows temperature dependence of n D of n-type diamond measured using Ga and Al contacts which is consistent with the result by experiments [27] and Monte Carlo calculation [28]. The increase in O KLL intensity may originate from the oxidation of Ga atoms.…”
Section: Implanted Ga Contactssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Typical I±V characteristics for implanted Ga contacts and thermally deposited Al and Ti contacts. Inset shows temperature dependence of n D of n-type diamond measured using Ga and Al contacts which is consistent with the result by experiments [27] and Monte Carlo calculation [28]. The increase in O KLL intensity may originate from the oxidation of Ga atoms.…”
Section: Implanted Ga Contactssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Another well studied FIB induced artifact is the implantation of Ga + ions (Cairney et al, 2000b;Ishitani et al, 1998;Reiner et al, 2004;Rubanov and Munroe, Fig. 4.…”
Section: The Fib-sample Interaction Effectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The FIB induced artifacts are described as morphological defects, crystal damage, uncontrolled Ga + implantation, amorphization, material redeposition, mixing of material, radiation damage, changes in surface geometry, and its electronic properties, etc. (Adams, 2006;Barber, 1993;Barna et al, 1999;Bever et al, 1992;Boxleitner et al, 2001;Brezna et al, 2003;Cairney and Munroe, 2003;Frey et al, 2003;Huang, 2004;Inkson et al, 2006;Ishitani et al, 1998Ishitani et al, , 2004McCaffrey et al, 2001;Nord et al, 2002;Perrey et al, 2004;Rajsiri et al, 2002;Reiner et al, 2004;Rubanov and Munroe, 2003Stanishevsky et al, 2002;Vetterli et al, 1995;Wang et al, 2005;Yabuuchi et al, 2004;Yu et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Very few reports are focused, however, on understanding the basic ion beam/material interactions that occur when a highly energetic focused Ga C beam is rastered across the surface of a material. 20,21 As the scale of materials drop into the nanometer range, it will become necessary to understand the surface changes that occur due to FIB milling, so that these artifacts may be accounted for during subsequent characterization. Until now, TEM has been the only technique used to determine the structural changes and thickness of the damaged layer caused by FIB sputtering with a Ga C beam, whereas TEM with energy-dispersive x-ray spectrometry (EDS) has been exploited to study the Ga implantation rate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%