Implantation of a sutureless bioprosthesis without guiding sutures in a heavily calcified aortic root

Schaefer, Anne‐Kristin; Oeser, Claudia; Kocher, Alfred; Laufer, Günther; Andreas, Martin

doi:10.1111/jocs.13538

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 3 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Reoperative Aortic Valve [40][41][42][43][44] Aortic root dilation, sinus of Valsalva aneurysms, annulo-aortic ectasia, and severe root asymmetry are contraindications to Perceval implantation. The use of the Perceval in cases of pure aortic insufficiency is possible.…”

Section: Aortic Insufficiency Root Pathology Andmentioning

confidence: 99%

The 10 Commandments of Perceval Implantation

Quinn

2023

Innovations�(Phila)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Aortic Insufficiency Root Pathology Andmentioning

confidence: 99%

The 10 Commandments of Perceval Implantation

Quinn

2023

Innovations�(Phila)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Sutureless surgical aortic valve replacement (SuAVR) prostheses have emerged as an alternative to stented bioprostheses and have been shown to decrease crossclamp, bypass, and operative times . They have been incorporated into valve conduits and have been used in heavily calcified aortic annuli . These sutureless bioprosthesis include the Sorin Perceval valve (Figure A; Sorin Biomedica Cardio, Saluggia, Italy), the Medtronic 3f‐Enable valve (Figure B; ATS Medical/Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN), and the Edwards Intuity Valve (Figure C; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Permanent pacemaker implantation and paravalvular leak rates following sutureless aortic valve operations

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation and paravalvular leak (PVL) rates after sutureless aortic valve replacement (SuAVR) vary widely. The aim of this metaanalysis was to examine the incidence of new PPM implantation and PVL after SuAVR.Methods: Studies evaluating PPM implantation and PVL rates after SuAVR were searched in Medline/PubMed, Ovid Journals, Clinicaltrials.gov, Cochrane central register of controlled trials and database. Studies with a sample size ≥10 were included in this analysis. Pooled proportions were calculated using both the fixed and randomeffects models. The heterogeneity among studies was tested using I 2 statistic. The study design was written in accordance with PRISMA guidelines.Results: Thirty studies involving 3993 patients with a median follow-up of 12 months were included. The median age was 77 years and males constituted 50%. There was a history of stroke and coronary artery disease in 6% and 31% of the population. Pooled proportions demonstrate a cumulative postoperative PPM rate of 8.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.6-9.5%, I 2 = 68.8%) and the overall rate of any PVL was 4.2% (95%CI 3.4-5%, I 2 = 76.1%) across all major SuAVR devices. The rate of severe PVL was only 0.4% (95%CI 0.2-0.7%, I 2 = 0%) at discharge and 0.5% (95%CI 0.2-0.9%, I 2 = 0%) at 12 months. Conclusions:In SuAVR prostheses implanted in this meta-analysis, the postoperative permanent pacemaker rate was higher (8.5%) than reported for non-SuAVR prosthesis.While the overall PVL rate was 4.2%, the incidence of severe PVL was only 0.4% at discharge and remained stable at 0.5% at 12 months. K E Y W O R D S paravalvular leak, permanent pacemaker, rapid deployment aortic valve, sutureless aortic valve

show abstract

Implantation of a sutureless bioprosthesis without guiding sutures in a heavily calcified aortic root

Cited by 2 publications

References 3 publications

The 10 Commandments of Perceval Implantation

The 10 Commandments of Perceval Implantation

Permanent pacemaker implantation and paravalvular leak rates following sutureless aortic valve operations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About