2002
DOI: 10.1149/1.1445433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implantation Induced Defects in the Retrograde Well with a Buried Layer

Abstract: This work investigates the implantation induced extended defects in the retrograde p-and n-well with/without a buried layer after postimplantation thermal annealing at 950°C in N 2 ambient. A preferential etchant of CrO 3 /HF mixed solution was used to delineate the defects induced by high-energy ion implantation. It is found that the extended defects elongated to the top surface of the retrograde well with a buried layer, which was implanted with high-energy boron ion at 1500 keV to a dose of 3 ϫ 10 13 cm Ϫ2 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(31 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first minimum g could be caused by the ex- tended defects, induced by the shallow boron implantation, which are originally generated at R P /2 and further diffuse during the thermal processing. The second minimum g is maybe due to the deep boron implantation, as reported by Hsu et al 25 who observed by scanning electron microscopy dislocation loops starting around 60% of R P . The second minimum g moves closer to the junction by reducing the p-well implantation energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first minimum g could be caused by the ex- tended defects, induced by the shallow boron implantation, which are originally generated at R P /2 and further diffuse during the thermal processing. The second minimum g is maybe due to the deep boron implantation, as reported by Hsu et al 25 who observed by scanning electron microscopy dislocation loops starting around 60% of R P . The second minimum g moves closer to the junction by reducing the p-well implantation energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…12͒, and the literature. 25 As shown in Fig. 11, both J A and J P increase with a reduction of the energy and a dose increase of the p-well implantation.…”
Section: ͓8͔mentioning
confidence: 80%