2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2016.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implantation damage formation in a-, c- and m-plane GaN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
41
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
7
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The narrowing of channel dips with normalised yield enhancement is mainly observed in m ‐plane ZnO (see Figure 1D). The figure shows the channel modification asymmetry for various ZnO orientations; a similar effect has been observed in GaN before 16,17 . The angular scans in Figure 1D indicate slight surface‐layer recovery in m ‐plane and c ‐plane ZnO.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The narrowing of channel dips with normalised yield enhancement is mainly observed in m ‐plane ZnO (see Figure 1D). The figure shows the channel modification asymmetry for various ZnO orientations; a similar effect has been observed in GaN before 16,17 . The angular scans in Figure 1D indicate slight surface‐layer recovery in m ‐plane and c ‐plane ZnO.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 65%
“…The figure shows the channel modification asymmetry for various ZnO orientations; a similar effect has been observed in GaN before. 16,17 The angular scans in Figure 1D indicate slight surface-layer recovery in m-plane and c-plane ZnO. The minimum yield was slightly decreased in c-plane ZnO (see the upper part of Figure 1D), and the angular scans were modified and broadened again after annealing in m-plane ZnO (see the bottom part of Figure 1D).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations