1993
DOI: 10.1016/0026-2692(93)90025-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implantation damage and its effect on channelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1994
1994
1994
1994

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“….. ,Ci). (6) For exampie the totai number of defects shown in figure i is 100 and so a possible distribution in this case is…”
Section: Point Defect Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“….. ,Ci). (6) For exampie the totai number of defects shown in figure i is 100 and so a possible distribution in this case is…”
Section: Point Defect Clusteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where SD(r) is a function of position only and represents the implantation dose required to reduce the crystalline volume density to l/e at this position. There is some evidence from channelling effect studies [6] that equation (37) gives a reasonable approximation for p,,. Most experimental work, however [7], shows that amorphization is characterized by an abrupt phase transition which occurs at each position for some critical dose SC(r).…”
Section: (35)mentioning
confidence: 99%