Implant Dentistry - A Rapidly Evolving Practice 2011
DOI: 10.5772/18309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implant Stability - Measuring Devices and Randomized Clinical Trial for ISQ Value Change Pattern Measured from Two Different Directions by Magnetic RFA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the rod and the test surface must maintain 0.6-2.0mm distance and if the distance is over 5mm, the measured value may be insignificant". 31 In the light of these results, it could be speculated that the Periotest method could lead to desultory measurement values especially in multicenter studies, where the observers have dissimilar conditions or measuring geometries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the rod and the test surface must maintain 0.6-2.0mm distance and if the distance is over 5mm, the measured value may be insignificant". 31 In the light of these results, it could be speculated that the Periotest method could lead to desultory measurement values especially in multicenter studies, where the observers have dissimilar conditions or measuring geometries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the present study was an in vitro study, which does not necessarily simulate the in vivo environment. It was reported that when using Osstell ™ mentor in clinical situations, the Osstell probe should maintain a distance of approximately 1–3 mm from the Smartpeg, at an angle of 90° and 3 mm coronal to the soft tissues, otherwise the measured value may be affected (21). These parameters may also account for variations in the interobserver reliability of the magnetic devices in vivo .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, there is no significant difference in the ISQ values between implants with no contact and light contact on provisional restoration. This might happen because the load generated from the provisional restoration did not produce strain above the physiological limit that could cause bone resorption [20][21]. Furthermore, the amount of occlusal load transmitted to the implant does not depend on occlusal contacts alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%