2004
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-004-0694-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implant removal for late-developing infection after instrumented posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis: reinstrumentation reduces loss of correction. A retrospective analysis of 45 cases

Abstract: A retrospective follow-up study of patients who, having undergone instrumented posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis, experienced late infection and then underwent either implant removal alone or implant removal and instrumented refusion. We conducted this study to determine whether it is possible to avoid loss of correction by a single-stage implant removal and reinstrumentation procedure. There have been a few reports of late-appearing infections after spinal instrumentation. Implant bulk, metallurgic reacti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
66
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
66
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…One-or two-stage re-instrumentation seems reasonable protocol as it is for an infected joint replacement. 20 This treatment pathway has been used previously for late infection in patients with deformity with less loss of correction. 21 However, there is always the risk of recurrent infection: two of our four re-instrumented patients had a recurrent SSI, despite appropriate combined antibiotic therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One-or two-stage re-instrumentation seems reasonable protocol as it is for an infected joint replacement. 20 This treatment pathway has been used previously for late infection in patients with deformity with less loss of correction. 21 However, there is always the risk of recurrent infection: two of our four re-instrumented patients had a recurrent SSI, despite appropriate combined antibiotic therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others, on the other hand, prefer removal of the instruments to eradicate the infection that followed the instrumented spinal fusion [1,4,13,55,56,62]. Another possibility is instrumentation removal in case of late deep infection, debridement and new reinstrumentation to achieve permanent correction for scoliosis [50]. These are well known options for implants with infections either by complete removal or one (implant change) or two stage (removal and delayed reimplantation) procedures [6,26,28,71].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors recommend implant removal to all patients once fusion is achieved [1,2], but this surgical procedure has some potential complications like progressive loss of correction [23] or vertebral body compression fractures [28]. The economic cost of removing implants to all patients with posterior spinal instrumentations is also quite considerable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%