Implant-Related Complications after Spinal Fusion: A Multicenter Study

Abstract

Study Design Retrospective analysis of prospectively database Objective Implant-related complications are an extremely important issue because they pose a burden to patients who underwent surgery. An understanding of these complications can help improve the postoperative management of patients undergoing spinal surgery. The current large-scale multicenter study aimed to identify postoperative implant-related complications that may require revision surgery. Methods In total, 3447 patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery were included in the analysis. Data about age at surgery, sex, preoperative diagnosis, surgical level, type of implant-related complications, causes of reoperation, and time from the initial to revision surgery were reviewed. Moreover, the characteristics of reoperation in 3 periods (within 30, 31–90, and over 90 days) were assessed. Result The overall incidence of implant-related complications was 4.6%. Adult spinal deformity was the most common diagnosis (9.9%), and thoracic-lumbar-sacral (42.9%) was the most common surgical level among patients with implant-related complications. Further, screw malposition was the most frequent implant-related complication (42.8%). In total, 89 (2.6%) patients underwent reoperation due to implant-related complications. The main causes of reoperation within 30, 31–90, and over 90 days were screw malposition (72.2%), screw loosening or pull out (81.8%), and rod or screw fracture (60.9%), respectively. Conclusion To the best of our knowledge, this was the first large-scale multicenter study that assessed the characteristics of patients who underwent reoperation due to spinal implant-related complications. The study results could improve the preoperative informed consent procedure about spinal fusion.

Letter to the Editor Concerning “Implant-Related Complications After Spinal Fusion: A Multicenter Study.” by Koshimizu et al.

“…We recently read the study conducted by Ye et al 1 with considerable interest. While the research offers valuable insights into the occurrence and causes of implant-related complications, we would like to highlight some methodological considerations that may have influenced the study’s results.…”