2023
DOI: 10.1111/cid.13200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implant rehabilitation of the esthetic area: A five‐year retrospective study comparing conventional and fully guided surgery

Abstract: Introduction: To compare the clinical outcomes of anterior single maxillary implants placed using conventional or guided implant surgery. Methods:In this retrospective clinical study 44 patients rehabilitated with a single anterior implant in the maxillary arch were included. Twenty-four implants were inserted applying a guided surgery approach (GS), and 20 applying a conventional freehand approach (CS). Outcome measures were: implant survival rate and complications; mean bone level (MBL) evaluated at surgery … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
references
References 27 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance