Implant-prosthetic Rehabilitation with and without Platform Switching: A Retrospective Clinical Cohort Study

Gago-García, Alejandro; Barrilero-Martín, Cayetana; Petrakakis, Pantelis; Elio-Oliveros, Joaquín de; Canto-Pingarrón, Mariano del; Alobera-Gracia, Miguel Ángel; Seco‐Calvo, Jesús

doi:10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3181

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Oral rehabilitation with dental implants restores form and function by stabilizing prostheses in anodontic spaces and its success is recognized by the survival of these devices due to bone loss in the cervical region (Camarda, et al, 2021). The longevity of implants is assessed using radiographs, CBCT, and peri-implant probing (Gago-García, et al, 2021). Cervical bone loss is dependent on the biological response of the host and is influenced by systemic, anatomical, and functional conditions, installation time, adequate function, and occlusion (Juan-Montesinos, et al, 2022;Abrahamsson, et al, 2009;Aslam & Ahmed, 2015).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Among the development strategies for reducing MBL, the combination of altering prosthetic platforms with lower diameter prosthetic abutments and repositioning the cervical portion of the implant to the bone level has led to less peri-implant bone loss and better stress distribution, as seen in platform-switching (Lazzara & Porter, 2006;Fuda, et al 2023), which brought biomechanical benefits by directing the stresses along the axis of the implant, away from the interface with the bone crest, and microbiological benefits by fixing the connective tissue to protect against microbial contamination and preserving the bone around the implant (Kowalski, et al, 2021;Gago-García, et al, 2021).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Influence of implant shape and prosthetic platform on cervical bone resorption: A systematic review

Soares,

Reis

2024

RSD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to critically evaluate the existing literature and answer the question, “Which implant format and prosthetic platform promotes the least cervical resorption?”. Material and method: SCOPUS, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE, Lilacs, and Google Scholar databases were searched in September 2023. Results: The database search resulted in 2850 articles. Of the 12 articles selected for full reading, 2 remained in this systematic review. There is a lack of information to form an opinion and to perform statistical analysis of the data, so descriptive analysis was performed. Conclusions: Based on the studies included in this systematic review, the implant shape influences primary stability and osseointegration, but it is not yet possible to relate it directly to POC. However, the type of prosthetic platform has a direct influence. In addition to the type of prosthetic platform used, the various characteristics related to the shape of the implant must be considered to maintain satisfactory bone levels.

show abstract