2009
DOI: 10.30684/etj.27.4.20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impingement Cooling Characteristics of a Cube in Cross Flow

Abstract: An experimental and numerical investigation is carried out for the heat transfer from a cube faces subjected to impinging jet which centrally strikes the top face of the cube. The cube is subjected also to a comparatively low velocity cross flow through the duct occupying the cube. Different factors affecting the cooling characteristics of the cube are studied as orifice size, jet velocity and orifice to cube top distance. The results show that cross flow increases heat rates from the cube for small size orifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen from this figure, the inline array enhanced the cooling effectiveness over that of the staggered array by (10.3 %). As stated before, the cross flow created by the jets didn't disturb the next jet that stands in its pathway for inline arrangement while in staggered configuration, the cross flow disturbed the downstream jets, as shown in the figure (13), therefore the impingement jets of staggered array are not active compared with the inline jets array. The variation of average cooling effectiveness ( ) along the flow direction for both arrays is presented in figures (17 to 20).…”
Section: Experimental Work Wall Cooling Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As seen from this figure, the inline array enhanced the cooling effectiveness over that of the staggered array by (10.3 %). As stated before, the cross flow created by the jets didn't disturb the next jet that stands in its pathway for inline arrangement while in staggered configuration, the cross flow disturbed the downstream jets, as shown in the figure (13), therefore the impingement jets of staggered array are not active compared with the inline jets array. The variation of average cooling effectiveness ( ) along the flow direction for both arrays is presented in figures (17 to 20).…”
Section: Experimental Work Wall Cooling Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For staggered array, it can be seen that the cross flow velocity has a great influence on the impingement jet, where high deflection is observed at the downstream compared with inline arrangements. Figure (13) shows the velocity vectors in X-Z plane for both inline and staggered arrangements. The results show that the channel flow is induced in inline jet arrangements while in staggered arrangement, these channels are not existed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation