1988
DOI: 10.1080/03086538808582781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imperialism and sexual exploitation: A response to Ronald Hyam's ‘empire and sexual opportunity’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 As a number of scholars have pointed out, the memsahib hypothesis has several gaping holes, not the least of which is that sexual relationships between white men and colonised women often provoked the ire of not only the women themselves, but also the men of their communities. 11 More provocatively, Ann Laura Stoler argues that this hypothesis fundamentally reverses the directionality of cause and effect; it is not that white women's arrival had the unfortunate side effect of introducing racial divisions into colonies. Rather, colonial authorities imported white women precisely at the moments when they wished to establish more firm racial boundaries; their arrival 'coincided with perceived threats to European prestige, increased racial conflict, covert challenges to colonial politics, outright expressions of nationalist resistance, and internal dissension among whites themselves'.…”
Section: Troublesome Intimacies: White Women and African 'Houseboys'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 As a number of scholars have pointed out, the memsahib hypothesis has several gaping holes, not the least of which is that sexual relationships between white men and colonised women often provoked the ire of not only the women themselves, but also the men of their communities. 11 More provocatively, Ann Laura Stoler argues that this hypothesis fundamentally reverses the directionality of cause and effect; it is not that white women's arrival had the unfortunate side effect of introducing racial divisions into colonies. Rather, colonial authorities imported white women precisely at the moments when they wished to establish more firm racial boundaries; their arrival 'coincided with perceived threats to European prestige, increased racial conflict, covert challenges to colonial politics, outright expressions of nationalist resistance, and internal dissension among whites themselves'.…”
Section: Troublesome Intimacies: White Women and African 'Houseboys'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 Anstruther does at times raise issues deserving of further attention. His comments on Stanley's total lack of 'all social instinct, especially in relation to women' (p. 187), confirmed in the latter regard by Richard Hall's more recent biography (1974), reminds us that even now there needs to be more work done on the connection between sexual repression and imperialist ventures, even though controversy rages over the terms of this link (Berger, 1988). Unfortunately, as with the discussion of the father-son relationship enjoyed by Livingstone and Stanley, Anstruther's book suffers here from the absence of a sophisticated social or psychological criticism, and / Presume is thus finally more reflective than illuminating.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 Hyam's critics have labelled him 'phallocentric' and an 'imperial apologist'. 51 The attacks on his argument made by feminist historians are perhaps unsurprising, as in his introduction, he directly labelled feminist constructs and approaches 'unhelpful' and 'hysterical' and argued that such approaches represent all women simply as 'victims'. 52 Yet, such a reading is reductionist and wilfully superficial.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%