'Imperialism': An Historiographical Revision

Fieldhouse, D. K.

doi:10.2307/2593218

Cited by 11 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Its inaugural conference was held from 1 to 6 September 1961 1961, Cairo 1964, Lusaka 1970, Algiers 1973, Colombo 1976, Havana 1979. The organisation continues to exist and function today in a modified form, even after the end of the Cold War.…”

Section: Non-aligned Movement (Incorporating Yugoslavia)mentioning

confidence: 99%

History

Ness¹,

Cope²

2016

The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Imperialism and Anti-Imperialism

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Non-aligned Movement (Incorporating Yugoslavia)mentioning

confidence: 99%

History

Ness¹,

Cope²

2016

The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Imperialism and Anti-Imperialism

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…10 10 Brunt, Themes , p. 110; Kemp, Theories , pp. 30–44, with further critique of Hobson ‘from the right’: Fieldhouse, ‘ “Imperialism” ’, pp. 188–92.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The rise and quick fall of the theory of ancient economic imperialism

Dmitriev¹

2009

The Economic History Review

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The theory of ancient economic imperialism has declined for two reasons. The first is the absence of any reliable evidence that the politics of ancient states was dictated by economic considerations. Additionally, the usual focus on the Roman provincial system limits the understanding of ‘economic imperialism’ to that of a ‘formal empire’ and ignores other ancient societies. The second reason, which so far has been neglected, is the changing vision of modern imperialism. Once the modern colonial system fell, the understanding of imperialism returned to that of the precolonial period, which saw imperialism in political and military terms.

show abstract

“…Three principal forms of imperialism are evident through history. First, during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries European mercantilism characterized the &dquo;old imperialism.&dquo; Second, the European empire building of 1870 and thereafter represented a shif't from informal to formal mechanisms of control and influence in the colonies during a period known as the &dquo;new imperialism&dquo; (see Fieldhouse, 1961, for a useful review of ideas on the literature on the old and new imperialisms). Third, the breakup of empires was accomplished by analysis of neo-colonialism and what today might be called &dquo;modern imperialism.&dquo; Analytically, the theory of modern imperialism moves in two directions.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%