1992
DOI: 10.1080/00207729208949452
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Imperfect debugging models with fault introduction rate for software reliability assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different fault content functions for corresponding to the cases of perfect and imperfect debugging are discussed as follows, process that does not incorporate additional faults in the software is referred to as perfect debugging. a ( N )=a (1+αN ) (6) Case 3: In this case, we consider an exponential fault content function using Yamada et al [21], it means faults are introduced exponentially with respect to number of users.…”
Section: Fault Content Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different fault content functions for corresponding to the cases of perfect and imperfect debugging are discussed as follows, process that does not incorporate additional faults in the software is referred to as perfect debugging. a ( N )=a (1+αN ) (6) Case 3: In this case, we consider an exponential fault content function using Yamada et al [21], it means faults are introduced exponentially with respect to number of users.…”
Section: Fault Content Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these methods, information concerning the development of software product, the method of failure detection, environmental factors, etc, is generally not used. [14], Delayed S-Shaped Model [13], Yamada imperfect debugging Model2 [14], Yamada exponential Model [13], P-N-Z Model [9], P-Z Model [9], Pham Zhang IFD Model [15] and Zhang-Teng-Pham Model [15].…”
Section: Choice Of Appropriate Software Reliability Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 50 software models have been proposed in literature [2], [3], [8], [9], [13], [14]. However none of these is effective in even types of situation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If some of the detected faults are not removed with certainty or new faults introduced during debugging process then it is called imperfect debugging. Yamada, Tokunou and Osaki [12] studied imperfect debugging model models with fault introduction rate. Xie and Yang [13] analyzed imperfect debugging on software development cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%