A low‐Tg epoxy‐amine system, based on the diglycidyl ether of butane‐1,4‐diol (DGEBD) and 4,9‐dioxadodecane‐1,12‐diamine (4D), and a high‐Tg epoxy‐amine system, based on diglycidyl ether of bisphenol A (DGEBA) and 4,4´‐methylenebis(3‐chloro‐2,6‐diethylaniline) (MCDEA), were studied during isothermal curing by means of microdielectrometry. The first one, which was investigated from 40°C to 60°C, exhibits only a gelation phenomenon. The latter was studied from 80°C to 150°C. At these temperatures, gelation and vitrification phenomena occur. To observe gelation phenomenon from the dielectric curves, three different approaches were developed (inflexion point as gelation criterion, percolation theory, and correlation between conductivity and viscosity) which fail to describe the complete evolution of the epoxy‐amine reactive systems during cure. This is due to the fact that at the gel point the macroscopic viscosity diverges whereas the conductivity values involve the ion motions, thus the local viscosities. So, there is no manifestation of gelation in the dielectric curves. The values of logσ/logσ0 vs. conversion x, where σ0 is the conductivity of the initial monomer mixture, give a single curve which can be fitted by a model proposed recently. In addition, a linear relation exists between log σ(x)/log σ0 and glass transition temperature, Tg(x). Thus, the combination of these relations with the modified Di Benedetto equation allows predicting kinetic and dielectric behaviors knowing the glass transition temperatures, the heat capacities, and the conductivities of the initial monomer mixture and of the fully cured network.