1995
DOI: 10.1016/0016-5085(95)27134-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impedance planimetric characterization of the esophagus in patients with severe systemic sclerosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interested reader is referred to those and other publications for methodological and analytical considerations and interpretation of the in vivo muscle function curves [10,13,15,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Corresponding analysis on length-tension relations in muscle strips in vitro has been described in other papers [26,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interested reader is referred to those and other publications for methodological and analytical considerations and interpretation of the in vivo muscle function curves [10,13,15,[18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Corresponding analysis on length-tension relations in muscle strips in vitro has been described in other papers [26,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A four-electrode impedance-measurement system located inside a bag on a 0.85 m long 15-French probe (William Cook, Europe, Bjaeverskov, Denmark) was used for measurement of luminal CSA in the esophagus [9,10]. The bag was 4 cm long and made of 50 lm thick non-conducting polyurethane.…”
Section: Experimental Probe Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the sphincter pressure could not be measured (in four patients), the bag was placed approximately 7 cm proximal to the pressure inversion point. Distension was achieved by raising the pressure in the bag in steps from 0.5 to 1.0, 1.5, 2.0 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0 kPa by altering the height of the level container above the zero pressure level [10]. A maximum value of 5.0 kPa was chosen, because pilot studies on healthy volunteers showed the threshold for nasopharyngeal and retrosternal discomfort was reached at this pressure.…”
Section: Study Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations