1986
DOI: 10.1097/00007890-198610000-00009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impairment of the Immune Response to Influenza Vaccination in Renal Transplant Recipients by Cyclosporine, but Not Azathioprine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
74
0
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
74
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…66 However, others have found an impaired immune response to influenza virus vaccine in recipients of solid-organ transplants, 64 including heart 68 and kidney. 69,70 Immunosuppression regimens appear to be an important variable explaining the divergence of vaccine efficacy. 105 Recipients of heart transplants administered cyclosporine-based immunosuppression responded well to pneumococcal vaccination but had a significantly reduced immune response to influenza vaccine.…”
Section: Vaccinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…66 However, others have found an impaired immune response to influenza virus vaccine in recipients of solid-organ transplants, 64 including heart 68 and kidney. 69,70 Immunosuppression regimens appear to be an important variable explaining the divergence of vaccine efficacy. 105 Recipients of heart transplants administered cyclosporine-based immunosuppression responded well to pneumococcal vaccination but had a significantly reduced immune response to influenza vaccine.…”
Section: Vaccinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…105 Recipients of heart transplants administered cyclosporine-based immunosuppression responded well to pneumococcal vaccination but had a significantly reduced immune response to influenza vaccine. 71 The use of mycophenolate mofetil 72 and cyclosporine 69 was associated with decreased antibody titer toward influenza vaccine in renal transplant recipients. Conversely, corticosteroids did not affect the responsiveness to the vaccine in a different patient population.…”
Section: Vaccinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, a booster immunisation after at least 4 weeks seems to be advisable in patients with diabetes mellitus. However, results of booster vaccination in other risk groups are disappointing [10,22].…”
Section: Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poor antibody response to influenza vaccination has been demonstrated in various risk groups, such as renal transplant patients [10], patients with malignant diseases [11,12] and in the aged [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In hemodialysis patients, uraemic toxins, blood transfusions, iron overload, dialysis membranes and biological incompatibility can adversely affect the immune response. 15 In RTRs, the immune response can be decreased in all patients, 16 or only in patients receiving cyclosporine 17 or mycophenolate mofetil therapy. 18,19 However, the immune response to influenza vaccination has been described as adequate, 20,21 whereas the sero-response to hepatitis B or pneumococcal vaccination after transplantation and dialysis appears to be poor.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%