1980
DOI: 10.1016/0008-8749(80)90404-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impairment of host-versus-graft reaction in pregnant mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This murine model provides an established experimental approach particularly in pregnancies challenged by stress [37][38][39][40][41][42]. It has been demonstrated that allogenically pregnant mice subjected to restraint or ultrasonic sound stress early in gestation showed a significant increase in the abortion rate [37][38][39][40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This murine model provides an established experimental approach particularly in pregnancies challenged by stress [37][38][39][40][41][42]. It has been demonstrated that allogenically pregnant mice subjected to restraint or ultrasonic sound stress early in gestation showed a significant increase in the abortion rate [37][38][39][40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The well-established abortion-prone (AP) combination consisting of CBA/J females mated with DBA/2J males as well as controls having normal pregnancies (NP), CBA/J females mated with BALB/c males, were employed in this study [29]. Foxp3 gfp transgenic mice in a C57/BL6 background [30], kindly provided by Prof. Rudensky, were also included in the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary model comprises a comparison between CBA/J females mated to DBA/2 males and CBA/J females mated to males of other strains, including C3H, C57BL/6 and the most common, Balb/c. Early studies suggested a high rate of non-pregnancy in DBA/2-mated CBA/J females (Clark, et al 1980). However, mothers of related CBA/J strains, CBA/Ca and CBA/N do not exhibit this phenomenon (Bobe and Kiger 1989).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…placenta) would affect both systemic and local immunity of pregnant mice and support fetal tolerance. The CBA/J x DBA/2 model first arose in the context of delineating these putative suppressive factors (Clark, et al 1980) as the model was held up as an example of adverse pregnancy outcome (resorption) in the face of deficiency of such suppression (Clark, et al 1980). Continued study of the model was also a venue for examining the production of soluble suppressive factors produced in the placenta or decidua.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%