2003
DOI: 10.1067/mob.2003.233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impairment of fetal growth potential and neonatal encephalopathy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
36
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding of lower scores in small fetuses born at term fits well with the already‐known increased risk of stillbirth, asphyxia and perinatal death2, 6, 82. The 95% CIs for the effect size in the FGR group crossed unity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding of lower scores in small fetuses born at term fits well with the already‐known increased risk of stillbirth, asphyxia and perinatal death2, 6, 82. The 95% CIs for the effect size in the FGR group crossed unity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Small fetal size is known to be a risk factor for perinatal morbidity and mortality1–4. Birth weight lower than the 5 th or 10 th centile of the population‐adjusted standard is often called small for gestational age (SGA)5, 6.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, lower birthweight may be a marker for multiple risk factors of neonatal encephalopathy. 23 We were also unable to attribute more severe brain injury to a maternal inflammatory condition. The failure to identify the specific antenatal risk factors associated with the pattern and severity of brain injury suggests that either we did not measure the relevant antenatal risk factors or that better antenatal markers need to be identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Thus, fetal growth restriction itself does not necessarily cause adverse perinatal outcomes but is associated with a wide variety of perinatal mortality and morbidity. We selected a number of perinatal outcomes that are clinically important and priority concerns of both obstetricians and neonatologists (24, 25). Consequently, these outcomes should be the “gold standard” in assessing the prenatal utility of these references, even though they may not be good indicators for long-term effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%