2023
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impairment-based assessments for patients with lateral ankle sprain: A systematic review of measurement properties

Abstract: Study design Systematic review. Background and objective The International Ankle Consortium developed a core outcome set for the assessment of impairments in patients with lateral ankle sprain (LAS) without consideration of measurement properties (MP). Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate MPs of assessments for the evaluation of individuals with a history of LAS. Methods This systematic review of measurement properties follows PRISMA and COSMIN guidelines. Databases Pubmed, CINAHL, Embase, We… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 96 publications
(148 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Functional assessments are highly recommended for the management of LAS patients [4,32]. Thus, the Ankle-GO score also includes 4 functional tests to evaluate postural control, hopping, jumping and agility, which are frequently impaired following LAS and CAI [2,5,9,37]. Furthermore, and as recommended by Caffrey et al, [21] the feeling of instability reported during the tests was also considered when calculating the Ankle-GO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional assessments are highly recommended for the management of LAS patients [4,32]. Thus, the Ankle-GO score also includes 4 functional tests to evaluate postural control, hopping, jumping and agility, which are frequently impaired following LAS and CAI [2,5,9,37]. Furthermore, and as recommended by Caffrey et al, [21] the feeling of instability reported during the tests was also considered when calculating the Ankle-GO.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%