Müller et al1 provide a technically sophisticated and informative set of meta-analyses examining altered brain activity in adults with symptomatic unipolar depression. The striking overall finding of their analyses is the lack of consistent group differences across studies. The absence of replicable effects across studies remained even when they addressed a number of potentially key confounds, such as examining only patients not receiving medication, patients without comorbidities, and patients without late-life or geriatric depression. Furthermore, Müller et al 1 make a number of important suggestions for conducting high-quality metaanalyses in the future that can be replicated and that can provide guidance for future research in the field. These excellent suggestions include the use of a reasonably large number of experiments with homogenous methods, avoiding region-ofinterest or restricted analysis studies that may bias results, only including studies with a sufficiently stringent false-positive correction, and providing sufficient details about the methods to allow replication. The inconsistency of prior results examining altered brain activity in unipolar depression revealed by Müller et al 1 should definitely give the field pause and highlights the need to address underlying causes of this lack of replication. However, some of these findings need to be interpreted with caution because Müller et al 1 do not fully follow their own recommendations, particularly regarding combining across homogenous methods. Specifically, the meta-analysis of cognitive tasks combined across paradigms that varied considerably in processing demands, and it is not clear that one would predict common regions to show altered activity in unipolar depression across quite different cognitive domains. This concern extends even to the meta-analysis of memory processing because this particular meta-analysis combined studies examining either working memory or episodic memory. Although some brain regions contribute to both working memory and episodic memory, there is also strong evidence for dissociations in the neural systems underlying working vs episodic memory and even for dissociations among subcomponents of episodic memory. Thus, to the extent that unipolar depression is associated with greater impairments in some components of memory than others, 2 one would not expect there to be consistent alterations in brain activation across all these different types of studies. and psychiatric comorbidity, which are both important dimensions of variance. However, it is also important to account for variance in symptom presentation among individuals with unipolar depression, even among individuals without comorbid conditions. For example, individuals with depression vary in the degree to which their clinical presentation is associated with alterations in mood or hedonic function, or both. Interestingly, some research is now starting to suggest that negative mood and impaired hedonic capacity may relate to different types of emotion processing im...