2014
DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbu101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impaired Working Memory Capacity Is Not Caused by Failures of Selective Attention in Schizophrenia

Abstract: The cognitive impairments associated with schizophrenia have long been known to involve deficits in working memory (WM) capacity. To date, however, the causes of WM capacity deficits remain unknown. The present study examined selective attention impairments as a putative contributor to observed capacity deficits in this population. To test this hypothesis, we used an experimental paradigm that assesses the role of selective attention in WM encoding and has been shown to involve the prefrontal cortex and the ba… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

6
30
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(45 reference statements)
6
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect could be explained in two ways. First, the distractor was a potent stimulus for activating the magnocellular pathway, which previous research shows can lead to greater capture of attention in PSZ (Erickson et al, submitted; Gold et al, 2006; Hahn, Robinson, Kaiser, Harvey, Beck, Leonard, Kappenman, Luck, & Gold, 2010; Leonard et al, in press). Second, the distractor was much closer to the fixation point than was the target, and as the next section will describe, PSZ may hyperfocus on the fixation point and surrounding region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This effect could be explained in two ways. First, the distractor was a potent stimulus for activating the magnocellular pathway, which previous research shows can lead to greater capture of attention in PSZ (Erickson et al, submitted; Gold et al, 2006; Hahn, Robinson, Kaiser, Harvey, Beck, Leonard, Kappenman, Luck, & Gold, 2010; Leonard et al, in press). Second, the distractor was much closer to the fixation point than was the target, and as the next section will describe, PSZ may hyperfocus on the fixation point and surrounding region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an attempt to isolate the capacity-limiting process, various investigations have probed different stages of WM storage, including selection (1; 2), consolidation (3; 4), and maintenance (5). Overall, the pattern of results from these studies implicates abnormalities in early stages of WM formation, such as encoding or consolidation; there is little evidence that capacity limitations are a consequence of accelerated decay during maintenance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been demonstrated both when items are selected based on their physical properties and when attention is focused spatially. [1][2][3] Particularly surprising were results from spatial attention paradigms based on Posner 4 in which a cue directs attention to 1 of 2 possible target locations. Here, the reaction time (RT) benefit conferred by a cue predicting the target location, relative to a non-predictive cue, actually tended to be larger in PSZ than in healthy control subjects (HCS), [5][6][7][8][9] suggesting greater attentional selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%