Abstract:Background. In recent years, a growing number of researchers showed significant interest in psychological and social interventions to manage chronic musculoskeletal (MSK) pain. Cognitive and emotional empathy is an attractive and valuable sociopsychological factor that may provide protection and resilience against chronic MSK pain. However, its effect on outpatients remains underexplored. Objective. To compare the empathy ability between chronic MSK pain outpatients and healthy controls and explore the relatio… Show more
“…Previous studies have found that many diseases had empathy disorders, such as psychiatric disorders (Decety and Moriguchi, 2007 ; Bragado-Jimenez and Taylor, 2012 ; Schreiter et al, 2013 ) and chronic pain (Sohn et al, 2016 ; De Tommaso et al, 2019 ; Ma et al, 2020 ; Mu et al, 2021 ; Zhang et al, 2021 ). It would be meaningful to see if the extension of MBIs to these subjects could improve their empathy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empathy also facilitates helping behavior, cooperation, and altruism (Feldmanhall et al, 2015 ). Impaired empathy is manifested by lacking understanding of the pain and plight of others, difficulty to be impressed, and appearing indifferent in real life, which is common in many psychiatric disorders (Decety and Moriguchi, 2007 ; Bragado-Jimenez and Taylor, 2012 ; Schreiter et al, 2013 ) and chronic pain (Sohn et al, 2016 ; De Tommaso et al, 2019 ; Ma et al, 2020 ; Mu et al, 2021 ; Zhang et al, 2021 ).…”
Empathy is essential for human survival and social interaction. Although mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have been used to improve empathy in healthy populations, its therapeutic efficacy remains unknown. This study aims to investigate the therapeutic effects of MBIs on empathy in a healthy population and the potential factors affecting the efficacy of MBIs. The literature search focused on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CNKI from inception to September 2022. Randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies reporting the effects of using MBIs on empathy in healthy populations were included. A total of 13 studies were included in this review. Results of the meta-analysis showed that MBIs improved empathy (SMD, 0.372, 95% CI, 0.164–0.579, p = 0.001) in the healthy population compared with that in the control group. Moreover, results of the subgroup analysis showed that intervention dose (over 24 h vs. under 24 h), format (online vs. offline), and types (different types) were important factors affecting treatment outcomes. This comprehensive review suggests that MBIs are effective treatment for empathy in healthy population. Future research should markedly focus on large-sample, rigorously designed experiments to explore the long-term effects of MBIs on empathy and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of MBIs. This study provides a reference for the daily application of MBIs.
“…Previous studies have found that many diseases had empathy disorders, such as psychiatric disorders (Decety and Moriguchi, 2007 ; Bragado-Jimenez and Taylor, 2012 ; Schreiter et al, 2013 ) and chronic pain (Sohn et al, 2016 ; De Tommaso et al, 2019 ; Ma et al, 2020 ; Mu et al, 2021 ; Zhang et al, 2021 ). It would be meaningful to see if the extension of MBIs to these subjects could improve their empathy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empathy also facilitates helping behavior, cooperation, and altruism (Feldmanhall et al, 2015 ). Impaired empathy is manifested by lacking understanding of the pain and plight of others, difficulty to be impressed, and appearing indifferent in real life, which is common in many psychiatric disorders (Decety and Moriguchi, 2007 ; Bragado-Jimenez and Taylor, 2012 ; Schreiter et al, 2013 ) and chronic pain (Sohn et al, 2016 ; De Tommaso et al, 2019 ; Ma et al, 2020 ; Mu et al, 2021 ; Zhang et al, 2021 ).…”
Empathy is essential for human survival and social interaction. Although mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) have been used to improve empathy in healthy populations, its therapeutic efficacy remains unknown. This study aims to investigate the therapeutic effects of MBIs on empathy in a healthy population and the potential factors affecting the efficacy of MBIs. The literature search focused on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and CNKI from inception to September 2022. Randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies reporting the effects of using MBIs on empathy in healthy populations were included. A total of 13 studies were included in this review. Results of the meta-analysis showed that MBIs improved empathy (SMD, 0.372, 95% CI, 0.164–0.579, p = 0.001) in the healthy population compared with that in the control group. Moreover, results of the subgroup analysis showed that intervention dose (over 24 h vs. under 24 h), format (online vs. offline), and types (different types) were important factors affecting treatment outcomes. This comprehensive review suggests that MBIs are effective treatment for empathy in healthy population. Future research should markedly focus on large-sample, rigorously designed experiments to explore the long-term effects of MBIs on empathy and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of MBIs. This study provides a reference for the daily application of MBIs.
“…Seven theoretically informed models based on increasing complexity were assessed (see Supporting Information: Figure ). First, we examined a one‐factor model (model 1) comprised of a general factor, then a two‐factor model (model 2) generally distinguishing between cognitive and affective components of empathy (Cuff et al, 2016), and a three‐factor model (model 3) that distinguished valences in cognitive empathy (Rueda et al, 2015; Zhang et al, 2021). Second, another three‐factor model (model 4) was constructed that distinguished between negative and positive valences in affective empathy (Löchner et al, 2022; Yan et al, 2021).…”
ObjectiveAlterations of empathy have been observed in patients with various mental disorders. The Perth Empathy Scale (PES) was recently developed to measure a multidimensional construct of empathy across positive and negative emotions. However, its psychometric properties and clinical applications have not been examined in the Chinese context.MethodsThe Chinese version of the PES was developed and administered to a large Chinese sample (n = 1090). Factor structure, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and convergent, discriminant, as well as concurrent validity were examined. Moreover, 50 patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 50 healthy controls were recruited to explore the clinical utility of the PES.ResultsConfirmatory factor analyses supported a theoretically congruent three‐factor structure of empathy, namely Cognitive Empathy, Negative Affective Empathy and Positive Affective Empathy. The PES showed good to excellent internal consistency reliability, good convergent and discriminant validity, acceptable concurrent validity, and moderate to high test–retest reliability. Patients with MDD had significantly lower PES scores compared to healthy controls. Linear discriminant function comprised of the three factors correctly differentiated 71% of participants, which further verified the clinical utility of the PES.ConclusionsOur findings indicated that the Chinese version of the PES is a reliable and valid instrument to measure cognitive and affective empathy across negative and positive emotions, and could therefore be used in both research and clinical practice.
“…Perspective-taking and reading facial expressions are both cognitive evaluative aspects of empathy [5]. The term "emotional empathy" is used to describe the vicarious sharing of emotion; the emotional components engage a partial affective sharing of others' affective states [6]. For instance, individuals vicariously experience the unpleasantness associated with the pain someone else is feeling.…”
The facial feedback hypothesis states that feedback from cutaneous and muscular afferents affects our emotion. Based on the facial feedback hypothesis, the purpose of this study was to determine whether enhancing negative emotion by activating a facial muscle (corrugator supercilii) increases the intensity of cognitive and emotional components of empathic pain. We also assessed whether the muscle contraction changed the pupil size, which would indicate a higher level of arousal. Forty-eight individuals completed 40 muscular contraction and relaxation trials while looking at images of five male and five female patients with neutral and painful facial expressions, respectively. Participants were asked to rate (1) how much pain the patient was in, and (2) how unpleasant their own feelings were. We also examined their facial muscle activities and changes in pupil size. No significant differences in pain or unpleasantness ratings were detected for the neutral face between the two conditions; however, the pain and unpleasantness ratings for the painful face were considerably higher in the contraction than relaxation condition. The pupils were considerably larger in the contraction than relaxation condition for both the painful and neutral faces. Our findings indicate that, by strengthening the corrugator supercilii, facial feedback can affect both the cognitive evaluative and affective sharing aspects of empathic pain.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.