2000
DOI: 10.1007/s001689900011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of water reallocation: A combined computable general equilibrium and recreation demand model approach

Abstract: To date, the regional economics literature has neglected to combine a county-level dynamic computable general equilibrium (CGE) model with a recreation demand model to analyze the temporal e¨ects of reallocating water from agriculture to recreational use. This study begins to address this weakness in the literature by considering water reallocation issues in rural Nevada. By combining a recreation demand model with a CGE model, this study analyzes the policy e¨ects on both the agricultural sectors and the recr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
50
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
50
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For the Arkansas River Basin, Goodman [2000] shows that temporary water transfers are less costly than building new dams. Seung et al [2000] look at water reallocation in Nevada. Diao and Roe [2003] study the effect of trade liberalization on water policy in Morocco.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Arkansas River Basin, Goodman [2000] shows that temporary water transfers are less costly than building new dams. Seung et al [2000] look at water reallocation in Nevada. Diao and Roe [2003] study the effect of trade liberalization on water policy in Morocco.…”
Section: Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is a top-down approach, which places more emphasis on the impact on the macro level or regional economy. Computable general equilibrium (CGE) models [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] are frequently used to simulate the operations of market economy and economic consequences in terms of production, trade, growth, water use and welfare caused by policy change by specifying the behavior of relevant "agents" (e.g., producers, households, government) as they interact across markets [17]. However, one limitation of the top-down approach is that spatial difference of water availability, crop peculiarities and historical practices that vary between regions are not included [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seung et al found that the SAM model overestimated the agricultural sector's outputs and factor income by comparing it with the social accounting matrix (SAM) model in researching agricultural transfer of water [8]. Furthermore, Seung et al proposed a dynamic CGE model consisting of three agricultural sectors and five non-agricultural sectors to investigate the economic impacts of water being transfered from agriculture to wetlands [9,10]. A recent extension was to integrate a CGE model by linking it with a water management model, which allowed for a finer depiction of water distributions within irrigated agriculture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%