2018 26th European Signal Processing Conference (EUSIPCO) 2018
DOI: 10.23919/eusipco.2018.8553212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of Viewing Conditions on HDR-VDP2

Abstract: HDR (High Dynamic Range) and WCG (Wide Color Gamut) increase significantly quality of viewing experience by rendering impressive images and videos. Automatic assessing the quality of these HDR WCG images is one crucial objective in broadcast process. Full-reference HDR metrics have been designed in the last years to achieve this objective:HDR-VDP2, HDR-VQM, PU-encoding metrics. Recent studies have pointed out that HDR-VDP2 is one of the best metric. Unfortunately, HDR-VDP2 is quite complex to use due to numero… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Section 3.1). We have shown in a previous work [18] that HDR-VDP-2 quality score shift when the angular resolution change but not in an expected way: HDR-VDP-2 score increases when the angular resolution decreases (or when the observer is closer to the screen).…”
Section: Considered Hdr Quality Metricsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Section 3.1). We have shown in a previous work [18] that HDR-VDP-2 quality score shift when the angular resolution change but not in an expected way: HDR-VDP-2 score increases when the angular resolution decreases (or when the observer is closer to the screen).…”
Section: Considered Hdr Quality Metricsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In addition those databases are composed of a rather small amount of images. To obtain a suitable database for our experiment, we considered the five databases presented in Table 1: Narwaria et al [21], Korshunov et al [22], Zerman et al [23], 4Kdtb [11] and HDdtb [18]. The first four databases were used for the training phase and HDdtb was considered as an independent test database used to validate our proposed metric.…”
Section: Image Quality Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these parameters, we use the values corresponding to the different subjective tests. We measured the spectrum of the Sony BVM-X300 and the SIM2 HDR47ES4MB monitor using the “X-Rite Eye one Pro 2” probe (more details are given in [ 45 ]. All these parameters are summarized in Table 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first database we propose was already presented in [ 45 ]. Eight images were selected from 3 collections: two are from the MPEG HDR sequences (FireEater and Market) [ 46 ], one is from the Stuttgart HDR Video Database [ 47 ] and the remaining five images are from the HDR photographic survey [ 48 ].…”
Section: Methodology For the Quality Assessment Metrics Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 One surprising result was that ΔE z frequently performed poorly. It had been found previously 27 that the offset for blue linearity correction in the J z a z b z space can cause mismatches. Additionally, the final equations of the J z a z b z color space were optimized using a dataset with a diffuse white at 997 cd/m 2 .…”
Section: Test Methodology and Performance Measurementioning
confidence: 97%