1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8227(99)00024-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of urbanisation on the lifestyle and on the prevalence of diabetes in native Asian Indian population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
82
2
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
82
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of urban facilities penetrating into PUVs was evident in two of our previous studies (1,16). Urbanization in India is expected to reach 46% by 2030 (11); therefore, in the future a larger contribution to the diabetic population would be from rural areas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The influence of urban facilities penetrating into PUVs was evident in two of our previous studies (1,16). Urbanization in India is expected to reach 46% by 2030 (11); therefore, in the future a larger contribution to the diabetic population would be from rural areas.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Previous studies in Chennai (13) and in periurban areas (1,16) showed an IGTto-diabetes ratio of Ͼ1, indicating a large pool of pre-diabetic subjects. Prevalence of IGT and its proportion to prevalence of diabetes will depend on the stage of the epidemic, the rapidity of conversion to diabetes, and the maximum attainable prevalence of diabetes in the population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increasing urbanisation tends to lead to lower physical activity worldwide [29]. The impact of urbanisation and its influence on life-style has been shown in an earlier study [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Height and weight were measured and BMI was calculated (wt in kg/ht in m 2 ). Waist and hip measurements were made and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) was calculated by standard procedures reported previously [7,8]. The cutoff values for normal were derived from the non-diabetic, healthy southern Indians as mentioned in an earlier study [7].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%