2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2009.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of Thai bio-ethanol policy target on land use and greenhouse gas emissions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A strong negative input in GHG balances occurs when high carbon lands are cultivated as is the case when forested lands are converted to sugarcane fields. This substantial LUC results in negative overall CO 2 balances for ethanol production [30][31][32].…”
Section: Assumptions About Land Use Change (Luc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A strong negative input in GHG balances occurs when high carbon lands are cultivated as is the case when forested lands are converted to sugarcane fields. This substantial LUC results in negative overall CO 2 balances for ethanol production [30][31][32].…”
Section: Assumptions About Land Use Change (Luc)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model analyses the land use competitions and overall biomass flows. Silalertruksa et al [11] used consequential life cycle assessment (LCA) approach to evaluate the environmental consequences of bioenergy (bio-ethanol) policy target on land use and greenhouse gas emissions. In this paper, the discussion is focused on the land use trade-off between biomass production and other land uses such as for food crops and urbanisation development.…”
Section: Regional Land Use and Resource Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The indirect land use impact of ethanol production in Thailand analyzed through the displacement of the cultivated area of other crops (sugarcane) in the country and reduced sugar production showed that ILUC could result in a larger impact on the emission of GHGs, mainly due to the change of above-ground and below-ground biomass and the soil carbon stock [49].…”
Section: Environmental Sustainabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%