2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.07.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of summer versus winter logging on understory vegetation in the Chequamegon-Nicolet National Forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, road verges were by far the richest forestry artefact type: 12 plots held 63 species whereas all other forestry artefacts only reached 24 to 34 species for the same number of plots. This is consistent with Buckley et al (2003), Watkins et al (2003) and Wolf et al (2008) who found that overall species richness and species diversity were significantly higher on road sides than in the forest interior. However, the grid design showed that road verges were also one of the less frequently encountered artefact types in the forest (0.4% of the total area-four plots) compared to other artefacts, especially tractor ruts (3.2% of the total area-29 plots).…”
Section: Each Artefact Type Contributes Specifically To Forest Plant supporting
confidence: 90%
“…For instance, road verges were by far the richest forestry artefact type: 12 plots held 63 species whereas all other forestry artefacts only reached 24 to 34 species for the same number of plots. This is consistent with Buckley et al (2003), Watkins et al (2003) and Wolf et al (2008) who found that overall species richness and species diversity were significantly higher on road sides than in the forest interior. However, the grid design showed that road verges were also one of the less frequently encountered artefact types in the forest (0.4% of the total area-four plots) compared to other artefacts, especially tractor ruts (3.2% of the total area-29 plots).…”
Section: Each Artefact Type Contributes Specifically To Forest Plant supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although we record higher mean species richness within the salvaged area, much of the difference is due to substantially higher frequencies of a few species common to both areas, including A. filix-femina, H. virginianum, L. canadensis, and species in the genera Poa, Solidago, and Viola. Extending the results of other studies of logging disturbance in the region, which show that increases in understory richness and cover are primarily due to the response of already common species (Crow et al, 2002;Wolf et al, 2008), we suggest that the impact of the combined disturbances of windthrow and logging on understory communities may not be very different than the impact of logging alone. Although undisturbed controls were not present in our study, others report much higher levels of plant community diversity in windthrown forest in comparison to adjacent, undisturbed forest (Palmer et al, 2000;Cooper-Ellis et al, 1999;Elliott et al, 2002;Rumbaitis del Rio, 2006).…”
Section: Salvage Logging Effects On Understory Response To Microtopogsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Presence or absence of these indicator species might be valuable for identifying areas of high regional conservation value. We chose healthy forest stands dominated by A. saccharum, a late-successional tree species, which is associated with a rich assemblage of understory plants and is economically important to the region for the production of timber and maple syrup (Kassulke and Esposito, 2005;Wolf et al, 2008). Sugar maple forests in northeastern Wisconsin might also be at greater risk than other forest types because the nitrogen and calcium rich leaves of sugar maples can sustain dense populations of earthworms (Walters and Reich, 1997;Bohlen et al, 2004;Reich et al, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%