Impacts of strategic orientations on Saudi firm performance: is supply chain integration a missing link?

Abstract

PurposeLittle previous research has investigated the relationships among strategic orientations, supply chain integration and firm performance. The purpose of this study is to advance a research model that examines the direct and indirect effects of strategic orientations via supply chain integration on firm performance in the Saudi transitional context.Design/methodology/approachThis study is based on data collected from a survey using questionnaires completed by 187 top management members of Saudi firms from different sectors. To analyse the data and test the proposed hypotheses, confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modelling were conducted using the AMOS statistical analysis package.FindingsResults show that both market orientation and supply chain integration have a significant positive direct effect on Saudi firm performance. They also reveal that supply chain integration fully mediates the effect of technology orientation on firm performance, while partially mediating the effect of market orientation on firm performance.Research limitations/implicationsThis study contributes to the literature by showing how SCI could serve as an organizational capability that links strategic resources to firm performance. The main limitation of this study is that it was not possible to generalize the findings. Future research perspectives were proposed to address this limitation and add new insights to the field.Practical implicationsThe results could help decision-makers in Saudi firms choose the right strategic orientations and aid them in integrating their supply chains by sharing the necessary information and coordinating operations with key partners to enhance their firms' performance.Originality/valueThis study is one of the first to conduct such an investigation in the Saudi context. The study simultaneously examines the role of supply chain integration in linking strategic orientations to firm performance and fills a current research gap in such a transitional context.

The contingent effect of supply chain strategies on the relationship between supply chain integration and operational performance in manufacturing context

“…(2017) and Khanuja and Jain (2020) that referred to the positive effect of SCI with its internal and external constituents on OP. These contradicting findings could be attributed to the diversity in research contexts, conceptualization, operationalization and measurement of both SCI and OP (Alsadi and Aloulou, 2021). Also, the insignificant relationship between II and performance might indicate that the significance of this relationship depends on the value of a third variable (a moderator) as mentioned by Ataseven and Nair (2017).…”

Study of the Environmental Factors' Effects on Big Data Analytics Adoption in Supply Chain Management

“…Firms, at the present time, can no longer compete at the individual entity level but as integral members of the supply chain (Green et al, 2006;Swee Lin Tan et al, 2014;Tseng & Liao, 2015). This fact also means that the intention to adopt BDA as a new technological innovation requires top management support to ensure the readiness of all trading partners for the adoption decision and, later, to effectively employ the adopted BDA technology in enhancing information sharing and collaborative activities among the multiple partner firms along the entire supply chains (Alsadi & Aloulou, 2021).…”

From Digital Platform Capabilities to Firm Performance

“…A large number of studies on the topics of DPC, FA, NC, and FP have used a multidimensional and board concept of performance, encompassing various aspects of competitiveness, operations, and management excellence and addressing the notion of performance over time (Aloulou, 2019a;Aloulou, 2023;Alsadi & Aloulou, 2021), as well as distinguishing between intermediate and final outcomes (Jiang et al, 2023;Jun et al, 2022;Khan & Tao, 2022;Liang et al, 2010;Mikalef & Pateli, 2017;Ramdan & Abdullah, 2021;Sarwar et al, 2023;Wielgos et al, 2021). The challenge of measuring FP as a unidimensional construct (Ashrafi et al, 2019;Bhatti et al, 2022) or a bi-dimensional construct (Khalil et al, 2023) still persists in the field of performance topic.…”