2012
DOI: 10.1016/s1002-0160(12)60021-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of Soil Additives on Crop Yield and C-Sequestration in Post Mine Substrates of Lusatia, Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the bulk density at the compacted site exceeds the general range of 1.00 g cm −3 to 1.50 g cm −3 reported for uncompacted soils [27], whereas at the uncompacted site values varied around the upper limit. However, bulk density values within soil profile at the compacted site were within the range of 1.63 g cm −3 to 1.74 g cm −3 reported for top 20 cm depth of recently reclaimed postmining soils in the region cultivated to Dactylis glomerata L. [28]. Interestingly, bulk density within soil profile at the uncompacted site was around the range of 1.57 g cm −3 to 1.60 g cm −3 reported by Boldt et al [29] for younger reclaimed site at the study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Furthermore, the bulk density at the compacted site exceeds the general range of 1.00 g cm −3 to 1.50 g cm −3 reported for uncompacted soils [27], whereas at the uncompacted site values varied around the upper limit. However, bulk density values within soil profile at the compacted site were within the range of 1.63 g cm −3 to 1.74 g cm −3 reported for top 20 cm depth of recently reclaimed postmining soils in the region cultivated to Dactylis glomerata L. [28]. Interestingly, bulk density within soil profile at the uncompacted site was around the range of 1.57 g cm −3 to 1.60 g cm −3 reported by Boldt et al [29] for younger reclaimed site at the study area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The use of digestate as fertilizer allow to recycle nutrients and reduce the use of chemical fertilizers [19]. Nonetheless, the quality of the digestate must be carefully evaluated prior usage [18].…”
Section: Digestate Direct Land Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were taken from an uncultivated area at successive 5-cm steps up to a depth of 30 cm using 100 cm 3 sample corer as outlined by Rodionov et al (2012). The soilforming substrate had an average bulk density of 1.6 AE 0.1 g/cm (mean AE standard error), an organic carbon content of 0.9 AE 0.5 g/kg, an inorganic carbon content of 3.2 AE 0.8 g/ kg, a total nitrogen content of 0.1 AE 0.0 g/kg and pH (H 2 O; 1:2.5 w/v) of 8.6 AE 0.3 (see Rodionov et al, 2012, for method details).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, Qu et al (2008) showed that the use of cross-linked polyacrylates may also result in increased water-holding capacity of the soil, while the degradation of these polymers is not known to generate toxic products. In addition, the reduced bioavailability of toxic trace elements resulting from application of polyacrylates (de Varennes et al, 2006;Qu & de Varennes, 2009) or of polyacrylates mixed with mineral additives (commercial soil additive = CSA) promoted a successful establishment of annual and perennial crops (Rodionov et al, 2012). However, the degradation rate of cross-linked polyacrylates in soils remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%