2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.07.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of shale gas production wastewater on disinfection byproduct formation: An investigation from a non-bromide perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three types of contaminated water were prepared by adding BPA (50 μM) into DI water, surface water collected from Lake Erie (Cleveland, OH), and Marcellus shale gas-produced water synthesized according to the reported water parameters (Table S3). , PMS solution was always prepared with DI water. Both half cells were buffered at pH 5 with 0.02 M acetate buffer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three types of contaminated water were prepared by adding BPA (50 μM) into DI water, surface water collected from Lake Erie (Cleveland, OH), and Marcellus shale gas-produced water synthesized according to the reported water parameters (Table S3). , PMS solution was always prepared with DI water. Both half cells were buffered at pH 5 with 0.02 M acetate buffer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was especially effective in reducing the formation of Br-DBPs, as the Br-DBPs decreased from 270 to 56 μg/L, a 79% removal. The impacts of the synthetic production wastewater blending on a baseline reference of DBP formation potential in river water have been quantified by the authors, ,, and the alteration of DBP formation was attributed to the introduction of bromide from production wastewater. The results of the present study implied the occurrence of bromide removal during the AE treatment of synthetic wastewater.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The natural water was a 0.45-μm-membrane-filtered grab sample from Swatara Creek (Middletown, Pennsylvania) (water quality parameters shown in Table S2), which was assumed free of production wastewater impact. A chlorine dose of 12 mg/L was applied to the mixture to initiate a DBP formation potential test, and no headspace was allowed in the bottle to minimize volatilization. , The chlorination took 24 h in absence of light at room temperature (21 °C) before chlorine residuals were quenched, and the samples were analyzed for DBPs. The chlorine quenching agents were sodium sulfite for THM analyses and ammonium chloride for HAA analyses, respectively, per EPA Methods 551.1 and 552.3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The details of surface water collection and chlorination can be found in Text S4 and Table S4. After 24 h of chlorination, samples were quenched with excess ammonium chloride and extracted immediately for trihalomethane (THM) and haloacetic acid (HAA) analyses following modified EPA Methods 551.1 and 552.3. , …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HAA extracts were analyzed on an HP 6890 GC (Palo Alto, CA, USA) equipped with an ECD and an Agilent DB-1701 capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 mm). The extraction and GC programing details can be found in our previous studies. , …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%