2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00168-008-0233-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of self-selection and transit proximity on commute mode choice: evidence from Taipei rapid transit system

Abstract: R14,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The range of catchment area for subway station is diverse, and different researchers have different emphases on the catchment area, which also leads to great differences in the calculation of the catchment area. In mainstream studies, Proximity-only models are mostly used to classify edge morphology [8][9][10][11]. The main classification results of edge morphology of site influence domain include two types, respectively circle and polygon.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range of catchment area for subway station is diverse, and different researchers have different emphases on the catchment area, which also leads to great differences in the calculation of the catchment area. In mainstream studies, Proximity-only models are mostly used to classify edge morphology [8][9][10][11]. The main classification results of edge morphology of site influence domain include two types, respectively circle and polygon.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aspects of neighborhood design such as walkable environments can promote health by encouraging exercise habits (or healthy behaviors). People are more likely to be physically active when their neighborhoods have sidewalks and parks (both of which are conducive to exercise) and accessible public transportation (Bedimo-Rung et al, 2005;Floyd et al, 2011;Handy et al, 2002;Maibach et al, 2009;Saelens et al, 2003;Sallis et al, 2004;Tsai, 2009). Strong ties and trust among people within such neighborhoods have also been associated with better health (Kawachi et al, 1997;Lochner et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%