TENCON 2017 - 2017 IEEE Region 10 Conference 2017
DOI: 10.1109/tencon.2017.8228216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of residential solar photovoltaic systems on voltage unbalance and network losses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Unbalanced Regime [8,10,12,13,17,18,23] Loss estimation using loss factor and load profile No No [9] Loss estimation using Elgerd's power loss formulas No No [11,19,20] Joule Loss estimation No No [14,24] Loss estimation using load factor No Yes [15,16] Loss estimation using scaling factor for load profile No No [21,22,24] Loss estimation based peak load duration No No [25][26][27][28] Loss estimation using the backward/forward method No No [28,29] Loss estimation with losses factor, load factor and load profile No Yes A comparison with the results obtained using the DigSilent PowerFactory (DSPF) simulation package certified the accuracy of algorithm. Even if the DSPF package is one of the most powerful packages in processes simulations from the generation, transmission, and distribution levels, it presents some disadvantages.…”
Section: Objective Function Online Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unbalanced Regime [8,10,12,13,17,18,23] Loss estimation using loss factor and load profile No No [9] Loss estimation using Elgerd's power loss formulas No No [11,19,20] Joule Loss estimation No No [14,24] Loss estimation using load factor No Yes [15,16] Loss estimation using scaling factor for load profile No No [21,22,24] Loss estimation based peak load duration No No [25][26][27][28] Loss estimation using the backward/forward method No No [28,29] Loss estimation with losses factor, load factor and load profile No Yes A comparison with the results obtained using the DigSilent PowerFactory (DSPF) simulation package certified the accuracy of algorithm. Even if the DSPF package is one of the most powerful packages in processes simulations from the generation, transmission, and distribution levels, it presents some disadvantages.…”
Section: Objective Function Online Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A scaling factor was used in References [14-16] for the characteristic load profiles, with attached pseudo measurements performed in the balanced LV networks with distributed generation sources in order to estimate power losses. In Reference [17,18], the loss factor and the load profile were used to calculate the power losses. The drawback of this method is represented by the estimation of two constant coefficients, A and B, for the homogeneous loads or the load profiles.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La ubicación y la conexión de los SFV varían de manera aleatoria, los valores de demanda se definen previamente a partir de un promedio de consumo de los usuarios y las capacidades instaladas de generación son establecidas de acuerdo con valores típicos de SFV [11]. En otros casos, los escenarios de conexión y desbalance se estudian de manera desagregada [12] y las simulaciones de flujo de carga son llevadas a cabo únicamente ante esos escenarios o variaciones.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…A scaling factor was used in [14][15][16] for the characteristic load profiles with attached pseudo measurements performed in the balanced LV grids with distributed generation sources to estimate the power losses. In [17,18], the power losses computation used the loss factor and the load profile. The drawback of this method are the estimation of the two coefficients A and B as constants for given homogeneous loads or load profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%