2005
DOI: 10.14796/jwmm.r223-18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of Rainfall Data on Model Refinement in Greater Pittsburgh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The system is currently supported by a network of 33 heated precipitation gauges installed at an average density of 1/15 mi 2 (1/40 km 2 ). The radar rainfall system provides continuous coverage in 15 min time steps for storms meeting specified minimum criteria for intensity and total depth (Meeneghan et al, 2004).…”
Section: Sewershed Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system is currently supported by a network of 33 heated precipitation gauges installed at an average density of 1/15 mi 2 (1/40 km 2 ). The radar rainfall system provides continuous coverage in 15 min time steps for storms meeting specified minimum criteria for intensity and total depth (Meeneghan et al, 2004).…”
Section: Sewershed Precipitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However the terrain within the Pittsburgh area is highly variable and storm fronts tend to be greatly influenced as they pass over the Allegheny range. The improved resolution of the precipitation data and the corresponding improvement to the model simulations provided by the high-resolution radar-rainfall system demonstrated that the geographical variability of storm depths, intensities and durations is significant in the Greater Pittsburgh region (Meeneghan et al, 2004).…”
Section: Precipitation Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative method that addressed the limitations of the current method was proposed. The impacts of rainfall data on modeling accuracy and refinement was presented for the Allegheny County (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) by Meeneghan et al (2005). The results showed that in an area such as…”
Section: Monitoring and Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%