2018
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of radiative accelerations on solar-like oscillating main-sequence stars

Abstract: Context. Chemical element transport processes are among the crucial physical processes needed for precise stellar modelling. Atomic diffusion by gravitational settling nowadays is usually taken into account, and is essential for helioseismic studies. On the other hand, radiative accelerations are rarely accounted for, act differently on the various chemical elements, and can strongly counteract gravity in some stellar mass domains. The resulting variations of the abundance profiles may significantly affect the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
91
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
8
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If CB2018 did not include diffusion, then there would be a tendency for them to allow higher values of f ov in their fits, such as they report. Additionally, diffusion alters the surface abundances (i.e., the abundances accessible to observation) to a degree that depends on metallicity and evolutionary state (see, e.g., Dotter et al 2017;Deal et al 2018). Enforcing the measured (surface) abundances when fitting models while at the same time ignoring diffusion can therefore bias the results, including the inferred f ov and α MLT values.…”
Section: Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If CB2018 did not include diffusion, then there would be a tendency for them to allow higher values of f ov in their fits, such as they report. Additionally, diffusion alters the surface abundances (i.e., the abundances accessible to observation) to a degree that depends on metallicity and evolutionary state (see, e.g., Dotter et al 2017;Deal et al 2018). Enforcing the measured (surface) abundances when fitting models while at the same time ignoring diffusion can therefore bias the results, including the inferred f ov and α MLT values.…”
Section: Summary Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since gravitational settling in higher-mass models leads to the unobserved consequence of zero-metallicity atmospheres unless it is resisted by mass loss or radiative levitation (e.g., Deal et al 2018), the computation of which is computationally expensive, we tapered off diffusion for evolutionary tracks with M > 1.25 M according to the equation given by Viani & Basu (2017). Despite the unphysical nature of this prescription, the star under investigation here is of a low enough mass that the diffusion-tapered models are irrelevant.…”
Section: Effect Of Input Physicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact the extension of the present investigation to an higher mass range will be affected not only by this supplementary degree of freedom, which would force the building of a huge dataset of stellar tracks, but also by the requirement of following the evolution of the convective core with a spatial resolution much higher than the one needed for the present investigation. Moreover, Deal et al (2018) point out that more massive stars may suffer from additional biases because of the effect of radiative accelerations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%