2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2008.04.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of ontogenetically migrating copepods on downward carbon flux in the western subarctic Pacific Ocean

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
46
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Metridia pacifica has been reported to be dormant in the Sea of Japan (Hirakawa & Imamura 1993) and the Oyashio region (Padmavati et al 2004). Contrary to these reports, active diel vertical migration during summer in the present region (Kobari et al 2008) suggests that there is no dormancy during summer in this region.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Metridia pacifica has been reported to be dormant in the Sea of Japan (Hirakawa & Imamura 1993) and the Oyashio region (Padmavati et al 2004). Contrary to these reports, active diel vertical migration during summer in the present region (Kobari et al 2008) suggests that there is no dormancy during summer in this region.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 54%
“…In the present study, the dominance of C5 in N. flemingeri in contrast to that of early stages of N. plumchrus in June 2009 is explainable by the difference in their life cycle schema, that is, earlier development in N. flemingeri than in N. plumchrus. Kobari et al (2008) revealed that during 31 July-16 August 2005, which was a season more than a month later than in the present study, N. flemingeri was distributed at 200-500 m during both day and night while N. plumchrus was distributed mostly at 0-50 m during both day and night. These vertical distributions may also be explained by the above life cycle schema.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 38%
“…It suggests that 52 to 44 mg C m -2 d -1 of new production should be grazed and / or released as DOC between 50 and 150m. These values are not unfounded regarding the metabolic carbon demand estimated for euphotic (Kobari et al, 2008-this issue) and mesopelagic (Steinberg et al, 2008) …”
Section: Conclusion and Summarymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, not all of the exportable carbon estimated from new production is exported as a vertical POC flux; part may be exported out of the area by advective transport of either POC or DOC (Bronk et al, 1994). In the mesopelagic (below 150m) the vertical supply of DOC from the euphotic zone could support a portion of the heterotrophic carbon demand, but not sufficiently (Steinberg et al, 2008). Instead, the mesopelagic carbon demand is probably sustained by the surface feeding of migrating zooplankton and their transport back to deeper layers, where they can excrete dissolved organic matter and release faecal pellets (Steinberg et al, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation