2008
DOI: 10.4296/cwrj3302137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of Large-Scale Circulation Variability on Low Streamflows over Canada: A Review

Abstract: Low streamflows constitute an important component of hydro-climatic extremes. This is particularly true for Canada where reduced flows can affect several economic and environmental activities ranging from less hydro-electric production and increased freshwater transportation costs, to reduced water quality and ecological habitat destruction. This paper reviews past research regarding the impacts of large-scale circulation patterns on streamflow variability (including low flows) over Canada.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
81
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
81
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of the NAO on observed extreme precipitation is largest in eastern North America. In northeast Canada the likelihood of a precipitation event that would occur once every 20-years under the negative phase of the NAO is decreased when the NAO is positive, consistent with the decreased precipitation and stream flow that is associated with the positive phase of the NAO (Bonsal and Shabbar 2008;Archambault et al 2008). The NAO has the opposite influence in the eastern United States, with the likelihood of a negative phase extreme event increased when the NAO is positive, in agreement with previous work (Durkee et al 2007;Archambault et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The influence of the NAO on observed extreme precipitation is largest in eastern North America. In northeast Canada the likelihood of a precipitation event that would occur once every 20-years under the negative phase of the NAO is decreased when the NAO is positive, consistent with the decreased precipitation and stream flow that is associated with the positive phase of the NAO (Bonsal and Shabbar 2008;Archambault et al 2008). The NAO has the opposite influence in the eastern United States, with the likelihood of a negative phase extreme event increased when the NAO is positive, in agreement with previous work (Durkee et al 2007;Archambault et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In the region south of the Great Lakes, the NAO risk factor is between 2 and 4, meaning that a negative phase NAO extreme rainfall event is up to four times more likely under the positive phase. This dipole pattern in north and south eastern North America is consistent with previous studies (Ning and Bradley 2014b;Durkee et al 2007;Bonsal and Shabbar 2008). The spatial pattern of NAO influence is generally comparable between the two observationally-based data sets, although the magnitude of increased likelihood of negative NAO extreme precipitation under a positive NAO regime is somewhat larger in the central and eastern United States in NARR compared to ANUSPLIN + Livneh (Fig.…”
Section: Naosupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations